From 82813ba9b4b31cd445a2ec1a1404de6e78f32b35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2018 17:13:03 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Only prune fences after wait-for-all
Git-commit: 82813ba9b4b31cd445a2ec1a1404de6e78f32b35
Patch-mainline: v4.16-rc6
No-fix: fa73055b8442c97b3ba7cd0aa57cd2ad32124201
References: FATE#322643 bsc#1055900

Currently, we only allow ourselves to prune the fences so long as
all the waits completed (i.e. all the fences we checked were signaled),
and that the reservation snapshot did not change across the wait.
However, if we only waited for a subset of the reservation object, i.e.
just waiting for the last writer to complete as opposed to all readers
as well, then we would erroneously conclude we could prune the fences as
indeed although all of our waits were successful, they did not represent
the totality of the reservation object.

V2: We only need to check the shared fences due to construction (i.e.
all of the shared fences will be later than the exclusive fence, if
any).

Fixes: e54ca9774777 ("drm/i915: Remove completed fences after a wait")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180307171303.29466-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit fa73055b8442c97b3ba7cd0aa57cd2ad32124201)

Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c |   16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -434,20 +434,28 @@ i915_gem_object_wait_reservation(struct
 			dma_fence_put(shared[i]);
 		kfree(shared);
 
+		/*
+		 * If both shared fences and an exclusive fence exist,
+		 * then by construction the shared fences must be later
+		 * than the exclusive fence. If we successfully wait for
+		 * all the shared fences, we know that the exclusive fence
+		 * must all be signaled. If all the shared fences are
+		 * signaled, we can prune the array and recover the
+		 * floating references on the fences/requests.
+		 */
 		prune_fences = count && timeout >= 0;
 	} else {
 		excl = reservation_object_get_excl_rcu(resv);
 	}
 
-	if (excl && timeout >= 0) {
+	if (excl && timeout >= 0)
 		timeout = i915_gem_object_wait_fence(excl, flags, timeout,
 						     rps_client);
-		prune_fences = timeout >= 0;
-	}
 
 	dma_fence_put(excl);
 
-	/* Oportunistically prune the fences iff we know they have *all* been
+	/*
+	 * Opportunistically prune the fences iff we know they have *all* been
 	 * signaled and that the reservation object has not been changed (i.e.
 	 * no new fences have been added).
 	 */