From 50682ee63fa3480b0541d0a311239189634b68ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2017 13:52:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/gen10+: use the SKL code for reading WM latencies
Git-commit: 50682ee63fa3480b0541d0a311239189634b68ab
Patch-mainline: v4.14-rc1
References: FATE#322643 bsc#1055900

Gen 10 should use the exact same code as Gen 9, so change the check to
take this into consideration, and also assume that future platforms
will run this code.

Also add a MISSING_CASE(), just in case we do something wrong, instead
of silently failing.

Cc: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170809205248.11917-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |    6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -2778,7 +2778,7 @@ hsw_compute_linetime_wm(const struct int
 static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 				  uint16_t wm[8])
 {
-	if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv)) {
+	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9) {
 		uint32_t val;
 		int ret, i;
 		int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv);
@@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct
 		}
 
 		/*
-		 * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl,glk
+		 * WaWmMemoryReadLatency:skl+,glk
 		 *
 		 * punit doesn't take into account the read latency so we need
 		 * to add 2us to the various latency levels we retrieve from the
@@ -2877,6 +2877,8 @@ static void intel_read_wm_latency(struct
 		wm[0] = 7;
 		wm[1] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM1_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
 		wm[2] = (mltr >> MLTR_WM2_SHIFT) & ILK_SRLT_MASK;
+	} else {
+		MISSING_CASE(INTEL_DEVID(dev_priv));
 	}
 }