Blob Blame History Raw
From f23ce757185319886ca80c4864ce5f81ac6cc9e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 12:58:24 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fs: Establish locking order for unrelated directories
Git-commit: f23ce757185319886ca80c4864ce5f81ac6cc9e9
Patch-mainline: v6.5-rc1
References: bsc#1221044 CVE-2023-52591

Currently the locking order of inode locks for directories that are not
in ancestor relationship is not defined because all operations that
needed to lock two directories like this were serialized by
sb->s_vfs_rename_mutex. However some filesystems need to lock two
subdirectories for RENAME_EXCHANGE operations and for this we need the
locking order established even for two tree-unrelated directories.
Provide a helper function lock_two_inodes() that establishes lock
ordering for any two inodes and use it in lock_two_directories().

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Message-id: <20230601105830.13168-4-jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

---
 fs/inode.c    |   42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/internal.h |    2 ++
 fs/namei.c    |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -973,6 +973,48 @@ void unlock_new_inode(struct inode *inod
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlock_new_inode);
 
 /**
+ * lock_two_inodes - lock two inodes (may be regular files but also dirs)
+ *
+ * Lock any non-NULL argument. The caller must make sure that if he is passing
+ * in two directories, one is not ancestor of the other.  Zero, one or two
+ * objects may be locked by this function.
+ *
+ * @inode1: first inode to lock
+ * @inode2: second inode to lock
+ * @subclass1: inode lock subclass for the first lock obtained
+ * @subclass2: inode lock subclass for the second lock obtained
+ */
+void lock_two_inodes(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+		     unsigned subclass1, unsigned subclass2)
+{
+	if (!inode1 || !inode2) {
+		/*
+		 * Make sure @subclass1 will be used for the acquired lock.
+		 * This is not strictly necessary (no current caller cares) but
+		 * let's keep things consistent.
+		 */
+		if (!inode1)
+			swap(inode1, inode2);
+		goto lock;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If one object is directory and the other is not, we must make sure
+	 * to lock directory first as the other object may be its child.
+	 */
+	if (S_ISDIR(inode2->i_mode) == S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode)) {
+		if (inode1 > inode2)
+			swap(inode1, inode2);
+	} else if (!S_ISDIR(inode1->i_mode))
+		swap(inode1, inode2);
+lock:
+	if (inode1)
+		inode_lock_nested(inode1, subclass1);
+	if (inode2 && inode2 != inode1)
+		inode_lock_nested(inode2, subclass2);
+}
+
+/**
  * lock_two_nondirectories - take two i_mutexes on non-directory objects
  *
  * Lock any non-NULL argument that is not a directory.
--- a/fs/internal.h
+++ b/fs/internal.h
@@ -117,6 +117,8 @@ extern int vfs_open(const struct path *,
 extern long prune_icache_sb(struct super_block *sb, struct shrink_control *sc);
 extern void inode_add_lru(struct inode *inode);
 extern int dentry_needs_remove_privs(struct dentry *dentry);
+void lock_two_inodes(struct inode *inode1, struct inode *inode2,
+		     unsigned subclass1, unsigned subclass2);
 
 extern bool __atime_needs_update(const struct path *, struct inode *, bool);
 static inline bool atime_needs_update_rcu(const struct path *path,
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -2906,8 +2906,8 @@ static struct dentry *lock_two_directori
 		return p;
 	}
 
-	inode_lock_nested(p1->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT);
-	inode_lock_nested(p2->d_inode, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
+	lock_two_inodes(p1->d_inode, p2->d_inode,
+			I_MUTEX_PARENT, I_MUTEX_PARENT2);
 	return NULL;
 }