From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:45:36 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] usb: xhci: make function xhci_dbc_free_req static
Git-commit: 66222f0d4b0ffba0bae2a6a785dc6eaa67cf532e
Patch-mainline: v4.16-rc1
References: FATE#325197

Function xhci_dbc_free_req is local to the source and does not need to
be in global scope, so make it static.

Cleans up sparse warning:
symbol 'xhci_dbc_free_req' was not declared. Should it be static?

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
index 48811d72a94c..8d47b6fbf973 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-dbgtty.c
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ static void dbc_write_complete(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, struct dbc_request *req)
 	spin_unlock(&port->port_lock);
 }
 
-void xhci_dbc_free_req(struct dbc_ep *dep, struct dbc_request *req)
+static void xhci_dbc_free_req(struct dbc_ep *dep, struct dbc_request *req)
 {
 	kfree(req->buf);
 	dbc_free_request(dep, req);
-- 
2.16.4