Blob Blame History Raw
From 99a27d59bd7b2ce1a82a4e826e8e7881f4d4954d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:17:33 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: simplify the calculation of the total amount of flash
 dirty data
Git-commit: 99a27d59bd7b2ce1a82a4e826e8e7881f4d4954d
References: bsc#1064232
Patch-mainline: v4.19-rc1

Currently we calculate the total amount of flash only devices dirty data
by adding the dirty data of each flash only device under registering
locker. It is very inefficient.

In this patch, we add a member flash_dev_dirty_sectors in struct cache_set
to record the total amount of flash only devices dirty data in real time,
so we didn't need to calculate the total amount of dirty data any more.

Signed-off-by: Tang Junhui <tang.junhui@zte.com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

---
 drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h    |  1 +
 drivers/md/bcache/super.c     |  2 ++
 drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c |  5 ++++-
 drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h | 19 -------------------
 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
index d6bf294f3907..3226d38bf859 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
@@ -525,6 +525,7 @@ struct cache_set {
 	unsigned		devices_max_used;
 	struct list_head	cached_devs;
 	uint64_t		cached_dev_sectors;
+	atomic_long_t		flash_dev_dirty_sectors;
 	struct closure		caching;
 
 	struct closure		sb_write;
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
index fa4058e43202..cea2a42ea276 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -1311,6 +1311,8 @@ static void flash_dev_free(struct closure *cl)
 {
 	struct bcache_device *d = container_of(cl, struct bcache_device, cl);
 	mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
+	atomic_long_sub(bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(d),
+			&d->c->flash_dev_dirty_sectors);
 	bcache_device_free(d);
 	mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
 	kobject_put(&d->kobj);
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
index ad45ebe1a74b..0d2a05074a81 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static uint64_t __calc_target_rate(struct cached_dev *dc)
 	 * flash-only devices
 	 */
 	uint64_t cache_sectors = c->nbuckets * c->sb.bucket_size -
-				bcache_flash_devs_sectors_dirty(c);
+				atomic_long_read(&c->flash_dev_dirty_sectors);
 
 	/*
 	 * Unfortunately there is no control of global dirty data.  If the
@@ -476,6 +476,9 @@ void bcache_dev_sectors_dirty_add(struct cache_set *c, unsigned inode,
 	if (!d)
 		return;
 
+	if (UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&c->uuids[inode]))
+		atomic_long_add(nr_sectors, &c->flash_dev_dirty_sectors);
+
 	stripe = offset_to_stripe(d, offset);
 	stripe_offset = offset & (d->stripe_size - 1);
 
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
index 610fb01de629..3745d7004c47 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.h
@@ -28,25 +28,6 @@ static inline uint64_t bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(struct bcache_device *d)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static inline uint64_t  bcache_flash_devs_sectors_dirty(struct cache_set *c)
-{
-	uint64_t i, ret = 0;
-
-	mutex_lock(&bch_register_lock);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < c->devices_max_used; i++) {
-		struct bcache_device *d = c->devices[i];
-
-		if (!d || !UUID_FLASH_ONLY(&c->uuids[i]))
-			continue;
-		ret += bcache_dev_sectors_dirty(d);
-	}
-
-	mutex_unlock(&bch_register_lock);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static inline unsigned offset_to_stripe(struct bcache_device *d,
 					uint64_t offset)
 {
-- 
2.16.4