From: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 22:33:23 -0700
Subject: drm/i915: Use crtc_state->has_psr instead of CAN_PSR for pipe update
Git-commit: c3d433617d2048f5fc3ee1135bce1a9bc2375662
Patch-mainline: v4.19-rc1
References: FATE#326289 FATE#326079 FATE#326049 FATE#322398 FATE#326166
In commit "drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank
evasion", the idea was to limit the PSR IDLE checks when PSR is
actually supported. While CAN_PSR does do that check, it doesn't
applies on a per-crtc basis. crtc_state->has_psr is a more granular
check that only applies to pipe(s) that have PSR enabled.
Without the has_psr check, we end up waiting on the eDP transcoder's
PSR_STATUS register irrespective of whether the pipe being updated is
driving it or not.
v2: Remove unnecessary parantheses, make checkpatch happy.
v3: Move the has_psr check to intel_psr_wait_for_idle and commit
message changes (DK).
v4: Derive dev_priv from intel_crtc_state (DK)
v5: Commit message changes to reflect the HW behavior (DK)
Fixes: a608987970b9 ("drm/i915: Wait for PSR exit before checking for vblank evasion")
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tarun Vyas <tarun.vyas@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712053323.26266-1-tarun.vyas@intel.com
Acked-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 7 ++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
@@ -1922,7 +1922,7 @@ void intel_psr_compute_config(struct int
void intel_psr_irq_control(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, bool debug);
void intel_psr_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 psr_iir);
void intel_psr_short_pulse(struct intel_dp *intel_dp);
-int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state);
/* intel_runtime_pm.c */
int intel_power_domains_init(struct drm_i915_private *);
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -717,11 +717,16 @@ void intel_psr_disable(struct intel_dp *
cancel_work_sync(&dev_priv->psr.work);
}
-int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+int intel_psr_wait_for_idle(const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
{
+ struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(new_crtc_state->base.crtc);
+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
i915_reg_t reg;
u32 mask;
+ if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* The sole user right now is intel_pipe_update_start(),
* which won't race with psr_enable/disable, which is
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sprite.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ void intel_pipe_update_start(const struc
* VBL interrupts will start the PSR exit and prevent a PSR
* re-entry as well.
*/
- if (CAN_PSR(dev_priv) && intel_psr_wait_for_idle(dev_priv))
+ if (intel_psr_wait_for_idle(new_crtc_state))
DRM_ERROR("PSR idle timed out, atomic update may fail\n");
local_irq_disable();