From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 22:05:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: fixup some comment typos and lengths
Git-commit: ff821d271415f17f1a704600420e92ebb9bfb32c
Patch-mainline: v4.15-rc1
References: bsc#1104967,FATE#325924
Various typos and/or spelling errors in comments. Fixes a few > 80 char
lines as well.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 3295859f419d..b600463791ec 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -707,7 +707,7 @@ void blk_mq_add_to_requeue_list(struct request *rq, bool at_head,
/*
* We abuse this flag that is otherwise used by the I/O scheduler to
- * request head insertation from the workqueue.
+ * request head insertion from the workqueue.
*/
BUG_ON(rq->rq_flags & RQF_SOFTBARRIER);
@@ -1137,7 +1137,8 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
if (ret == BLK_STS_RESOURCE) {
/*
* If an I/O scheduler has been configured and we got a
- * driver tag for the next request already, free it again.
+ * driver tag for the next request already, free it
+ * again.
*/
if (!list_empty(list)) {
nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
@@ -2299,8 +2300,11 @@ static void blk_mq_add_queue_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
mutex_lock(&set->tag_list_lock);
- /* Check to see if we're transitioning to shared (from 1 to 2 queues). */
- if (!list_empty(&set->tag_list) && !(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)) {
+ /*
+ * Check to see if we're transitioning to shared (from 1 to 2 queues).
+ */
+ if (!list_empty(&set->tag_list) &&
+ !(set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)) {
set->flags |= BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED;
/* update existing queue */
blk_mq_update_tag_set_depth(set, true);
@@ -2532,10 +2536,9 @@ static void blk_mq_queue_reinit(struct request_queue *q)
/*
* redo blk_mq_init_cpu_queues and blk_mq_init_hw_queues. FIXME: maybe
- * we should change hctx numa_node according to new topology (this
- * involves free and re-allocate memory, worthy doing?)
+ * we should change hctx numa_node according to the new topology (this
+ * involves freeing and re-allocating memory, worth doing?)
*/
-
blk_mq_map_swqueue(q);
blk_mq_sysfs_register(q);
--
2.16.4