From 74c7b0782b15bc2478f557cea34b3fe34d452dc6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2017 12:10:33 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Stop listening to request resubmission from the signaler kthread
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Git-commit: 74c7b0782b15bc2478f557cea34b3fe34d452dc6
Patch-mainline: v4.15-rc5
References: FATE#322643 bsc#1055900
No-fix: 776bc27fd8ab67a675cb0041d3af361af5d0e290

The intent here was that we would be listening to
i915_gem_request_unsubmit in order to cancel the signaler quickly and
release the reference on the request. Cancelling the signaler is done
directly via intel_engine_cancel_signaling (called from unsubmit), but
that does not directly wake up the signaling thread, and neither does
setting the request->global_seqno back to zero wake up listeners to the
request->execute waitqueue. So the only time that listening to the
request->execute waitqueue would wake up the signaling kthread would be
on the request resubmission, during which time we would already receive
wake ups from rejoining the global breadcrumbs wait rbtree.

Trying to wake up to release the request remains an issue. If the
signaling was cancelled and no other request required signaling, then it
is possible for us to shutdown with the reference on the request still
held. To ensure that we do not try to shutdown, leaking that request, we
kick the signaling threads whenever we disarm the breadcrumbs, i.e. on
parking the engine when idle.

V2: We do need to be sure to release the last reference on stopping the
kthread; asserting that it has been dropped already is insufficient.

Fixes: d6a2289d9d6b ("drm/i915: Remove the preempted request from the execution queue")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171208121033.5236-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit 776bc27fd8ab67a675cb0041d3af361af5d0e290)

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ void intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(str
 	struct intel_wait *wait, *n, *first;
 
 	if (!b->irq_armed)
-		return;
+		goto wakeup_signaler;
 
 	/* We only disarm the irq when we are idle (all requests completed),
 	 * so if the bottom-half remains asleep, it missed the request
@@ -208,6 +208,14 @@ void intel_engine_disarm_breadcrumbs(str
 	b->waiters = RB_ROOT;
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * The signaling thread may be asleep holding a reference to a request,
+	 * that had its signaling cancelled prior to being preempted. We need
+	 * to kick the signaler, just in case, to release any such reference.
+	 */
+wakeup_signaler:
+	wake_up_process(b->signaler);
 }
 
 static bool use_fake_irq(const struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
@@ -651,23 +659,15 @@ static int intel_breadcrumbs_signaler(vo
 		}
 
 		if (unlikely(do_schedule)) {
-			DEFINE_WAIT(exec);
-
 			if (kthread_should_park())
 				kthread_parkme();
 
-			if (kthread_should_stop()) {
-				GEM_BUG_ON(request);
+			if (unlikely(kthread_should_stop())) {
+				i915_gem_request_put(request);
 				break;
 			}
 
-			if (request)
-				add_wait_queue(&request->execute, &exec);
-
 			schedule();
-
-			if (request)
-				remove_wait_queue(&request->execute, &exec);
 		}
 		i915_gem_request_put(request);
 	} while (1);