From a922c0c7a6b7b84351c4051fc9defe1222185c16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 09:56:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915/guc: Don't make assumptions while getting the lrca offset
Git-commit: a922c0c7a6b7b84351c4051fc9defe1222185c16
Patch-mainline: v4.15-rc1
References: FATE#322643 bsc#1055900

Using the HWSP ggtt_offset to get the lrca offset is only correct if the
HWSP happens to be before it (when we reuse the PPHWSP of the kernel
context as the engine HWSP). Instead of making this assumption, get the
lrca offset from the kernel_context engine state.

And while looking at this part of the GuC interaction, it was also
noticed that the firmware expects the size of only the engine context
(context minus the execlist part, i.e. don't include the first 80
dwords), so pass the right size.

V2: Use the new macros to prevent abusive overuse of the old ones (Chris).

Reported-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170712193032.27080-2-michel.thierry@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170913085605.18299-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c |   21 ++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_guc_submission.c
@@ -1022,6 +1022,12 @@ static void guc_policies_init(struct guc
 	policies->is_valid = 1;
 }
 
+/*
+ * The first 80 dwords of the register state context, containing the
+ * execlists and ppgtt registers.
+ */
+#define LR_HW_CONTEXT_SIZE	(80 * sizeof(u32))
+
 static int guc_ads_create(struct intel_guc *guc)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = guc_to_i915(guc);
@@ -1036,6 +1042,8 @@ static int guc_ads_create(struct intel_g
 	} __packed *blob;
 	struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
 	enum intel_engine_id id;
+	const u32 skipped_offset = LRC_HEADER_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE;
+	const u32 skipped_size = LRC_PPHWSP_SZ * PAGE_SIZE + LR_HW_CONTEXT_SIZE;
 	u32 base;
 
 	GEM_BUG_ON(guc->ads_vma);
@@ -1066,13 +1074,20 @@ static int guc_ads_create(struct intel_g
 	 * engines after a reset. Here we use the Render ring default
 	 * context, which must already exist and be pinned in the GGTT,
 	 * so its address won't change after we've told the GuC where
-	 * to find it.
+	 * to find it. Note that we have to skip our header (1 page),
+	 * because our GuC shared data is there.
 	 */
 	blob->ads.golden_context_lrca =
-		dev_priv->engine[RCS]->status_page.ggtt_offset;
+		guc_ggtt_offset(dev_priv->kernel_context->engine[RCS].state) + skipped_offset;
 
+	/*
+	 * The GuC expects us to exclude the portion of the context image that
+	 * it skips from the size it is to read. It starts reading from after
+	 * the execlist context (so skipping the first page [PPHWSP] and 80
+	 * dwords). Weird guc is weird.
+	 */
 	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
-		blob->ads.eng_state_size[engine->guc_id] = engine->context_size;
+		blob->ads.eng_state_size[engine->guc_id] = engine->context_size - skipped_size;
 
 	base = guc_ggtt_offset(vma);
 	blob->ads.scheduler_policies = base + ptr_offset(blob, policies);