Blob Blame History Raw
From 0f4f199443faca715523b0659aa536251d8b978f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 15:56:04 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] iwlwifi: pcie: fix memory leaks in iwl_pcie_ctxt_info_gen3_init
Git-commit: 0f4f199443faca715523b0659aa536251d8b978f
Patch-mainline: v5.4-rc4
References: bsc#1111666

In iwl_pcie_ctxt_info_gen3_init there are cases that the allocated dma
memory is leaked in case of error.

DMA memories prph_scratch, prph_info, and ctxt_info_gen3 are allocated
and initialized to be later assigned to trans_pcie. But in any error case
before such assignment the allocated memories should be released.

First of such error cases happens when iwl_pcie_init_fw_sec fails.
Current implementation correctly releases prph_scratch. But in two
sunsequent error cases where dma_alloc_coherent may fail, such
releases are missing.

This commit adds release for prph_scratch when allocation for
prph_info fails, and adds releases for prph_scratch and prph_info when
allocation for ctxt_info_gen3 fails.

Fixes: 2ee824026288 ("iwlwifi: pcie: support context information for 22560 devices")
Signed-off-by: Navid Emamdoost <navid.emamdoost@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/ctxt-info-gen3.c |   36 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/ctxt-info-gen3.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/ctxt-info-gen3.c
@@ -102,13 +102,9 @@ int iwl_pcie_ctxt_info_gen3_init(struct
 
 	/* allocate ucode sections in dram and set addresses */
 	ret = iwl_pcie_init_fw_sec(trans, fw, &prph_scratch->dram);
-	if (ret) {
-		dma_free_coherent(trans->dev,
-				  sizeof(*prph_scratch),
-				  prph_scratch,
-				  trans_pcie->prph_scratch_dma_addr);
-		return ret;
-	}
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_free_prph_scratch;
+
 
 	/* Allocate prph information
 	 * currently we don't assign to the prph info anything, but it would get
@@ -116,16 +112,20 @@ int iwl_pcie_ctxt_info_gen3_init(struct
 	prph_info = dma_alloc_coherent(trans->dev, sizeof(*prph_info),
 				       &trans_pcie->prph_info_dma_addr,
 				       GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!prph_info)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!prph_info) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_free_prph_scratch;
+	}
 
 	/* Allocate context info */
 	ctxt_info_gen3 = dma_alloc_coherent(trans->dev,
 					    sizeof(*ctxt_info_gen3),
 					    &trans_pcie->ctxt_info_dma_addr,
 					    GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ctxt_info_gen3)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!ctxt_info_gen3) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto err_free_prph_info;
+	}
 
 	ctxt_info_gen3->prph_info_base_addr =
 		cpu_to_le64(trans_pcie->prph_info_dma_addr);
@@ -176,6 +176,20 @@ int iwl_pcie_ctxt_info_gen3_init(struct
 	iwl_set_bit(trans, CSR_GP_CNTRL, CSR_AUTO_FUNC_INIT);
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_free_prph_info:
+	dma_free_coherent(trans->dev,
+			  sizeof(*prph_info),
+			prph_info,
+			trans_pcie->prph_info_dma_addr);
+
+err_free_prph_scratch:
+	dma_free_coherent(trans->dev,
+			  sizeof(*prph_scratch),
+			prph_scratch,
+			trans_pcie->prph_scratch_dma_addr);
+	return ret;
+
 }
 
 void iwl_pcie_ctxt_info_gen3_free(struct iwl_trans *trans)