Blob Blame History Raw
From 3b9cf7905fe3ab35ab437b5072c883e609d3498d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 16:26:14 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] of: unittest: for strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field
Git-commit: 3b9cf7905fe3ab35ab437b5072c883e609d3498d
Patch-mainline: v4.18-rc1
References: bsc#1051510

For strings, account for trailing \0 in property length field:

This is consistent with how dtc builds string properties.

Function __of_prop_dup() would misbehave on such properties as it duplicates
properties based on the property length field creating new string values
without trailing \0s.

Signed-off-by: Stefan M Schaeckeler <sschaeck@cisco.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Tested-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/of/unittest.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest.c b/drivers/of/unittest.c
index 6bb37c18292a..ecee50d10d14 100644
--- a/drivers/of/unittest.c
+++ b/drivers/of/unittest.c
@@ -165,20 +165,20 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
 	/* Add a new property - should pass*/
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) == 0, "Adding a new property failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to add an existing property - should fail */
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "new-property";
 	prop->value = "new-property-data-should-fail";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_add_property(np, prop) != 0,
 		 "Adding an existing property should have failed\n");
 
 	/* Try to modify an existing property - should pass */
 	prop->value = "modify-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating an existing property should have passed\n");
 
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static void __init of_unittest_dynamic(void)
 	prop++;
 	prop->name = "modify-property";
 	prop->value = "modify-missing-property-data-should-pass";
-	prop->length = strlen(prop->value);
+	prop->length = strlen(prop->value) + 1;
 	unittest(of_update_property(np, prop) == 0,
 		 "Updating a missing property should have passed\n");
 
-- 
2.18.0