From 169b9afee572853522901b7cbf34842c0494a887 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2020 12:19:06 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/hwirq: Remove stale forward irq_chip declaration

References: bsc#1065729
Patch-mainline: v5.10-rc1
Git-commit: 169b9afee572853522901b7cbf34842c0494a887

Since commit identified below, the forward declaration of
struct irq_chip is useless (was struct hw_interrupt_type at that time)

Remove it, together with the associated comment.

Fixes: c0ad90a32fb6 ("[PATCH] genirq: add ->retrigger() irq op to consolidate hw_irq_resend()")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fbe58d27cf128d5fe581e4510ded8701858f268e.1596716328.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu
Acked-by: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
index 3a0db7b0b46e..538698facb80 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
@@ -372,12 +372,6 @@ static inline void may_hard_irq_enable(void) { }
 
 #define ARCH_IRQ_INIT_FLAGS	IRQ_NOREQUEST
 
-/*
- * interrupt-retrigger: should we handle this via lost interrupts and IPIs
- * or should we not care like we do now ? --BenH.
- */
-struct irq_chip;
-
 #endif  /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif	/* __KERNEL__ */
 #endif	/* _ASM_POWERPC_HW_IRQ_H */
-- 
2.28.0