From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2018 22:32:34 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: megaraid_sas_fusion: Mark expected switch fall-through
Git-commit: 74e716f2a9d8fbe039b4149537dbc4cdf1b4bdf3
Patch-mainline: v5.0-rc1
References: FATE#325920

In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where
we are expecting to fall through.

Notice that, in this particular case, I replaced "Fall thru" with a "Fall
through" annotation and added a dash as a token in order to separate the
"Fall through" annotation from the rest of the comment on the same line,
which is what GCC is expecting to find.

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Acked-by: Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
index c5e6bccb0895..8f37ad83be9a 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/megaraid/megaraid_sas_fusion.c
@@ -3453,7 +3453,7 @@ complete_cmd_fusion(struct megasas_instance *instance, u32 MSIxIndex)
 				atomic_dec(&lbinfo->scsi_pending_cmds[cmd_fusion->pd_r1_lb]);
 				cmd_fusion->scmd->SCp.Status &= ~MEGASAS_LOAD_BALANCE_FLAG;
 			}
-			//Fall thru and complete IO
+			/* Fall through - and complete IO */
 		case MEGASAS_MPI2_FUNCTION_LD_IO_REQUEST: /* LD-IO Path */
 			atomic_dec(&instance->fw_outstanding);
 			if (cmd_fusion->r1_alt_dev_handle == MR_DEVHANDLE_INVALID) {
-- 
2.16.4