From: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 19:17:49 +0100
Subject: sfc: pass the correctly bogus filter_id to rps_may_expire_flow()
Patch-mainline: v4.17-rc2
Git-commit: a7f80189e41c96c0c6210e9198a31859c91eb3e5
References: bsc#1105555 FATE#326117

When we inserted an ARFS filter for ndo_rx_flow_steer(), we didn't know
 what the filter ID would be, so we just returned 0.  Thus, we must also
 pass 0 as the filter ID when calling rps_may_expire_flow() for it, and
 rely on the flow_id to identify what we're talking about.

Fixes: 3af0f34290f6 ("sfc: replace asynchronous filter operations")
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c  |    3 +--
 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef10.c
@@ -4776,8 +4776,7 @@ static bool efx_ef10_filter_rfs_expire_o
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
-	if (!rps_may_expire_flow(efx->net_dev, spec->dmaq_id,
-				 flow_id, filter_idx)) {
+	if (!rps_may_expire_flow(efx->net_dev, spec->dmaq_id, flow_id, 0)) {
 		ret = false;
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/farch.c
@@ -2912,7 +2912,7 @@ bool efx_farch_filter_rfs_expire_one(str
 	if (test_bit(index, table->used_bitmap) &&
 	    table->spec[index].priority == EFX_FILTER_PRI_HINT &&
 	    rps_may_expire_flow(efx->net_dev, table->spec[index].dmaq_id,
-				flow_id, index)) {
+				flow_id, 0)) {
 		efx_farch_filter_table_clear_entry(efx, table, index);
 		ret = true;
 	}