From 9a6b7c0ff64945366c05338873e2456b990948e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:06:08 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] vfs: Avoid softlockups in drop_pagecache_sb()
Patch-mainline: v5.0-rc5
Git-commit: c27d82f52f75fc9d8d9d40d120d2a96fdeeada5e
References: bsc#1118505

When superblock has lots of inodes without any pagecache (like is the
case for /proc), drop_pagecache_sb() will iterate through all of them
without dropping sb->s_inode_list_lock which can lead to softlockups
(one of our customers hit this).

Fix the problem by going to the slow path and doing cond_resched() in
case the process needs rescheduling.

Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

---
 fs/drop_caches.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/drop_caches.c b/fs/drop_caches.c
index 82377017130f..d31b6c72b476 100644
--- a/fs/drop_caches.c
+++ b/fs/drop_caches.c
@@ -21,8 +21,13 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
 	spin_lock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry(inode, &sb->s_inodes, i_sb_list) {
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
+		/*
+		 * We must skip inodes in unusual state. We may also skip
+		 * inodes without pages but we deliberately won't in case
+		 * we need to reschedule to avoid softlockups.
+		 */
 		if ((inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_WILL_FREE|I_NEW)) ||
-		    (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0)) {
+		    (inode->i_mapping->nrpages == 0 && !need_resched())) {
 			spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 			continue;
 		}
@@ -30,6 +35,7 @@ static void drop_pagecache_sb(struct super_block *sb, void *unused)
 		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
 		spin_unlock(&sb->s_inode_list_lock);
 
+		cond_resched();
 		invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping, 0, -1);
 		iput(toput_inode);
 		toput_inode = inode;
-- 
2.16.4