From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 13:25:44 -0700
Subject: x86/insn-eval: Indicate a 32-bit displacement if ModRM.mod is 0 and
 ModRM.rm is 101b
Git-commit: e526a302e425ab11111efc5f59e52449bbcc768e
Patch-mainline: v4.15-rc1
References: fate#325790

Section 2.2.1.3 of the Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software
Developer's Manual volume 2A states that when ModRM.mod is zero and
ModRM.rm is 101b, a 32-bit displacement follows the ModRM byte. This means
that none of the registers are used in the computation of the effective
address. A return value of -EDOM indicates callers that they should not
use the value of registers when computing the effective address for the
instruction.

In long mode, the effective address is given by the 32-bit displacement
plus the location of the next instruction. In protected mode, only the
displacement is used.

The instruction decoder takes care of obtaining the displacement.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ricardo.neri@intel.com
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
Cc: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Chen Yucong <slaoub@gmail.com>
Cc: Adam Buchbinder <adam.buchbinder@gmail.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509135945-13762-18-git-send-email-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
---
 arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
index 01e36bd86a5d..6bf819f923e7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/insn-eval.c
@@ -427,6 +427,14 @@ static int get_reg_offset(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	switch (type) {
 	case REG_TYPE_RM:
 		regno = X86_MODRM_RM(insn->modrm.value);
+
+		/*
+		 * ModRM.mod == 0 and ModRM.rm == 5 means a 32-bit displacement
+		 * follows the ModRM byte.
+		 */
+		if (!X86_MODRM_MOD(insn->modrm.value) && regno == 5)
+			return -EDOM;
+
 		if (X86_REX_B(insn->rex_prefix.value))
 			regno += 8;
 		break;
@@ -770,10 +778,21 @@ void __user *insn_get_addr_ref(struct insn *insn, struct pt_regs *regs)
 			eff_addr = base + indx * (1 << X86_SIB_SCALE(sib));
 		} else {
 			addr_offset = get_reg_offset(insn, regs, REG_TYPE_RM);
-			if (addr_offset < 0)
+			/*
+			 * -EDOM means that we must ignore the address_offset.
+			 * In such a case, in 64-bit mode the effective address
+			 * relative to the RIP of the following instruction.
+			 */
+			if (addr_offset == -EDOM) {
+				if (user_64bit_mode(regs))
+					eff_addr = (long)regs->ip + insn->length;
+				else
+					eff_addr = 0;
+			} else if (addr_offset < 0) {
 				goto out;
-
-			eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
+			} else {
+				eff_addr = regs_get_register(regs, addr_offset);
+			}
 		}
 
 		eff_addr += insn->displacement.value;