From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 10:33:40 -0500
Subject: x86/dumpstack: Fix occasionally missing registers
Patch-mainline: v4.14-rc1
Git-commit: b0529becebde629ff6abf2afdca6def6824f4fa9
References: bnc#1018348

If two consecutive stack frames have pt_regs, the oops dump code fails
to print the second frame's registers.  Fix that.

Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 3b3fa11bc700 ("x86/dumpstack: Print any pt_regs found on the stack")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/269c5c00c7d45c699f3dcea42a3a594c6cf7a9a3.1499786555.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c |   12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_stru
 		if (stack_name)
 			printk("%s <%s>\n", log_lvl, stack_name);
 
+		if (regs && on_stack(&stack_info, regs, sizeof(*regs)))
+			__show_regs(regs, 0);
+
 		/*
 		 * Scan the stack, printing any text addresses we find.  At the
 		 * same time, follow proper stack frames with the unwinder.
@@ -118,10 +121,8 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_stru
 			 * Don't print regs->ip again if it was already printed
 			 * by __show_regs() below.
 			 */
-			if (regs && stack == &regs->ip) {
-				unwind_next_frame(&state);
-				continue;
-			}
+			if (regs && stack == &regs->ip)
+				goto next;
 
 			if (stack == ret_addr_p)
 				reliable = 1;
@@ -144,6 +145,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_stru
 			if (!reliable)
 				continue;
 
+next:
 			/*
 			 * Get the next frame from the unwinder.  No need to
 			 * check for an error: if anything goes wrong, the rest
@@ -153,7 +155,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_stru
 
 			/* if the frame has entry regs, print them */
 			regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state);
-			if (regs)
+			if (regs && on_stack(&stack_info, regs, sizeof(*regs)))
 				__show_regs(regs, 0);
 		}