From a514d63882c3d2063b21b865447266ebcb18b04c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:06:39 +0800
Patch-mainline: v4.17-rc2
Git-commit: a514d63882c3d2063b21b865447266ebcb18b04c
References: bsc#1031392
Subject: [PATCH 29/31] btrfs: qgroup: Commit transaction in advance to reduce
 early EDQUOT

Unlike previous method that tries to commit transaction inside
qgroup_reserve(), this time we will try to commit transaction using
fs_info->transaction_kthread to avoid nested transaction and no need to
worry about locking context.

Since it's an asynchronous function call and we won't wait for
transaction commit, unlike previous method, we must call it before we
hit the qgroup limit.

So this patch will use the ratio and size of qgroup meta_pertrans
reservation as indicator to check if we should trigger a transaction
commit.  (meta_prealloc won't be cleaned in transaction committ, it's
useless anyway)

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |    6 ++++++
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c     |    1 +
 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c      |   43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 fs/btrfs/transaction.c |    1 +
 fs/btrfs/transaction.h |   14 ++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -728,6 +728,12 @@ struct btrfs_delayed_root;
  */
 #define BTRFS_FS_EXCL_OP			14
 
+/*
+ * To info transaction_kthread we need an immediate commit so it doesn't
+ * need to wait for commit_interval
+ */
+#define BTRFS_FS_NEED_ASYNC_COMMIT		17
+
 struct btrfs_fs_info {
 	u8 fsid[BTRFS_FSID_SIZE];
 	u8 chunk_tree_uuid[BTRFS_UUID_SIZE];
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -1888,6 +1888,7 @@ static int transaction_kthread(void *arg
 
 		now = get_seconds();
 		if (cur->state < TRANS_STATE_BLOCKED &&
+		    !test_bit(BTRFS_FS_NEED_ASYNC_COMMIT, &fs_info->flags) &&
 		    (now < cur->start_time ||
 		     now - cur->start_time < fs_info->commit_interval)) {
 			spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/workqueue.h>
 #include <linux/btrfs.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
 
 #include "ctree.h"
 #include "transaction.h"
@@ -2417,8 +2418,21 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static bool qgroup_check_limits(const struct btrfs_qgroup *qg, u64 num_bytes)
+/*
+ * Two limits to commit transaction in advance.
+ *
+ * For RATIO, it will be 1/RATIO of the remaining limit
+ * (excluding data and prealloc meta) as threshold.
+ * For SIZE, it will be in byte unit as threshold.
+ */
+#define QGROUP_PERTRANS_RATIO		32
+#define QGROUP_PERTRANS_SIZE		SZ_32M
+static bool qgroup_check_limits(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
+				const struct btrfs_qgroup *qg, u64 num_bytes)
 {
+	u64 limit;
+	u64 threshold;
+
 	if ((qg->lim_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_RFER) &&
 	    qgroup_rsv_total(qg) + (s64)qg->rfer + num_bytes > qg->max_rfer)
 		return false;
@@ -2427,6 +2441,31 @@ static bool qgroup_check_limits(const st
 	    qgroup_rsv_total(qg) + (s64)qg->excl + num_bytes > qg->max_excl)
 		return false;
 
+	/*
+	 * Even if we passed the check, it's better to check if reservation
+	 * for meta_pertrans is pushing us near limit.
+	 * If there is too much pertrans reservation or it's near the limit,
+	 * let's try commit transaction to free some, using transaction_kthread
+	 */
+	if ((qg->lim_flags & (BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_RFER |
+			      BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_EXCL))) {
+		if (qg->lim_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_LIMIT_MAX_EXCL)
+			limit = qg->max_excl;
+		else
+			limit = qg->max_rfer;
+		threshold = (limit - qg->rsv.values[BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_DATA] -
+			    qg->rsv.values[BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_META_PREALLOC]) /
+			    QGROUP_PERTRANS_RATIO;
+		threshold = min_t(u64, threshold, QGROUP_PERTRANS_SIZE);
+
+		/*
+		 * Use transaction_kthread to commit transaction, so we no
+		 * longer need to bother nested transaction nor lock context.
+		 */
+		if (qg->rsv.values[BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_META_PERTRANS] > threshold)
+			btrfs_commit_transaction_locksafe(fs_info);
+	}
+
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -2471,7 +2510,7 @@ static int qgroup_reserve(struct btrfs_r
 
 		qg = unode_aux_to_qgroup(unode);
 
-		if (enforce && !qgroup_check_limits(qg, num_bytes)) {
+		if (enforce && !qgroup_check_limits(fs_info, qg, num_bytes)) {
 			ret = -EDQUOT;
 			goto out;
 		}
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.c
@@ -2279,6 +2279,7 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrf
 	 */
 	cur_trans->state = TRANS_STATE_COMPLETED;
 	wake_up(&cur_trans->commit_wait);
+	clear_bit(BTRFS_FS_NEED_ASYNC_COMMIT, &fs_info->flags);
 
 	spin_lock(&fs_info->trans_lock);
 	list_del_init(&cur_trans->list);
--- a/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/transaction.h
@@ -204,6 +204,20 @@ int btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(str
 int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans);
 int btrfs_commit_transaction_async(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
 				   int wait_for_unblock);
+
+/*
+ * Try to commit transaction asynchronously, so this is safe to call
+ * even holding a spinlock.
+ *
+ * It's done by informing transaction_kthread to commit transaction without
+ * waiting for commit interval.
+ */
+static inline void btrfs_commit_transaction_locksafe(
+		struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
+{
+	set_bit(BTRFS_FS_NEED_ASYNC_COMMIT, &fs_info->flags);
+	wake_up_process(fs_info->transaction_kthread);
+}
 int btrfs_end_transaction_throttle(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans);
 int btrfs_should_end_transaction(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans);
 void btrfs_throttle(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info);