From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 15:26:06 +0100
Subject: ACPICA: Rename variable to match upstream
Patch-mainline: v4.16-rc1
Git-commit: 4b688b1c48dbbc6b1c939899f992985e2b03150c
References: bsc#1117419

There is a variable name mismatch in acpi_ut_strtoul_multiply64()
between the ACPICA code in the kernel and the corresponding upstream
code which may be problematic if changes to this particular piece of
code are made upstream and ported to Linux, so rename the variable
in question to match its name in the upstream code.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/acpica/utstrsuppt.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/utstrsuppt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/utstrsuppt.c
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ acpi_ut_insert_digit(u64 *accumulated_va
 static acpi_status
 acpi_ut_strtoul_multiply64(u64 multiplicand, u32 base, u64 *out_product)
 {
-	u64 val;
+	u64 product;
 	u64 quotient;
 
 	/* Exit if either operand is zero */
@@ -393,15 +393,15 @@ acpi_ut_strtoul_multiply64(u64 multiplic
 		return (AE_NUMERIC_OVERFLOW);
 	}
 
-	val = multiplicand * base;
+	product = multiplicand * base;
 
 	/* Check for 32-bit overflow if necessary */
 
-	if ((acpi_gbl_integer_bit_width == 32) && (val > ACPI_UINT32_MAX)) {
+	if ((acpi_gbl_integer_bit_width == 32) && (product > ACPI_UINT32_MAX)) {
 		return (AE_NUMERIC_OVERFLOW);
 	}
 
-	*out_product = val;
+	*out_product = product;
 	return (AE_OK);
 }