From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2017 15:12:52 +0100
Subject: KVM: s390: use created_vcpus in more places
Patch-mainline: v4.16-rc1
Git-commit: 241e3ec0faf5ab1a0d9b1f6c43eefa919fb9c112
References: bsc#1136206

commit a03825bbd0c3 ("KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus") introduced
kvm->created_vcpus to avoid races with the existing kvm->online_vcpus
scheme. One place was "forgotten" and one new place was "added".
Let's fix those.

Reported-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Fixes: 4e0b1ab72b8a ("KVM: s390: gs support for kvm guests")
Fixes: a03825bbd0c3 ("KVM: s390: use kvm->created_vcpus")
Acked-by: Liang Yan <lyan@suse.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -576,7 +576,7 @@ static int kvm_vm_ioctl_enable_cap(struc
 	case KVM_CAP_S390_GS:
 		r = -EINVAL;
 		mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-		if (atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
+		if (kvm->created_vcpus) {
 			r = -EBUSY;
 		} else if (test_facility(133)) {
 			set_kvm_facility(kvm->arch.model.fac_mask, 133);
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_set_processor_feat(s
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
-	if (!atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus)) {
+	if (!kvm->created_vcpus) {
 		bitmap_copy(kvm->arch.cpu_feat, (unsigned long *) data.feat,
 			    KVM_S390_VM_CPU_FEAT_NR_BITS);
 		ret = 0;