From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:34:59 -0700
Subject: e1000e: Drop unnecessary __E1000_DOWN bit twiddling
Patch-mainline: v5.5-rc1
Git-commit: daee5598e491d8d3979bd4ad6c447d89ce57b446
References: bsc#1158049

Since we no longer check for __E1000_DOWN in e1000e_close we can drop the
spot where we were restoring the bit. This saves us a bit of unnecessary
complexity.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |    7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -7396,15 +7396,13 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev
 {
 	struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
 	struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
-	bool down = test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
 
 	e1000e_ptp_remove(adapter);
 
 	/* The timers may be rescheduled, so explicitly disable them
 	 * from being rescheduled.
 	 */
-	if (!down)
-		set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
+	set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
 	del_timer_sync(&adapter->watchdog_timer);
 	del_timer_sync(&adapter->phy_info_timer);
 
@@ -7422,9 +7420,6 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* Don't lie to e1000_close() down the road. */
-	if (!down)
-		clear_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
 	unregister_netdev(netdev);
 
 	if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))