From 68e7e50f195f34d0d539282779cad073d999192b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 08:43:05 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ipmi: Don't use BMC product/dev ids in the BMC name
Git-commit: 68e7e50f195f34d0d539282779cad073d999192b
Patch-mainline: v4.15-rc1
References: FATE#326156

There are a lot of bad things that a set of BMCs could do that
would really confuse the IPMI driver; it's possible for BMCs with
different GUIDs to have the same product/devid (though that's
not technically legal), which would result in platform device
namespace collisions.  Fixing it would involve either using
the GUID in the BMC name, which resulted in huge names, or
just using an ida for numbering the BMCs.  The latter approach
was chosen to avoid the huge names.

Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c | 45 +++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
index 8814f4bed862..f42459a27b19 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_msghandler.c
@@ -268,7 +268,6 @@ struct bmc_device {
 	struct list_head       intfs;
 	unsigned char          guid[16];
 	int                    guid_set;
-	char                   name[16];
 	struct kref	       usecount;
 };
 #define to_bmc_device(x) container_of((x), struct bmc_device, pdev.dev)
@@ -2591,6 +2590,8 @@ static struct bmc_device *ipmi_find_bmc_prod_dev_id(
 	return bmc;
 }
 
+static DEFINE_IDA(ipmi_bmc_ida);
+
 static void
 release_bmc_device(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -2601,8 +2602,10 @@ static void
 cleanup_bmc_device(struct kref *ref)
 {
 	struct bmc_device *bmc = container_of(ref, struct bmc_device, usecount);
+	int id = bmc->pdev.id; /* Unregister overwrites id */
 
 	platform_device_unregister(&bmc->pdev);
+	ida_simple_remove(&ipmi_bmc_ida, id);
 }
 
 static void ipmi_bmc_unregister(ipmi_smi_t intf)
@@ -2663,47 +2666,19 @@ static int ipmi_bmc_register(ipmi_smi_t intf, int ifnum)
 		       bmc->id.product_id,
 		       bmc->id.device_id);
 	} else {
-		unsigned char orig_dev_id = bmc->id.device_id;
-		int warn_printed = 0;
-		struct bmc_device *tmp_bmc;
-
-		snprintf(bmc->name, sizeof(bmc->name),
-			 "ipmi_bmc.%4.4x", bmc->id.product_id);
-		bmc->pdev.name = bmc->name;
-
-		mutex_lock(&ipmidriver_mutex);
-		while ((tmp_bmc = ipmi_find_bmc_prod_dev_id(&ipmidriver.driver,
-						 bmc->id.product_id,
-						 bmc->id.device_id))) {
-			kref_put(&tmp_bmc->usecount, cleanup_bmc_device);
-			if (!warn_printed) {
-				printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
-				       "This machine has two different BMCs"
-				       " with the same product id and device"
-				       " id.  This is an error in the"
-				       " firmware, but incrementing the"
-				       " device id to work around the problem."
-				       " Prod ID = 0x%x, Dev ID = 0x%x\n",
-				       bmc->id.product_id, bmc->id.device_id);
-				warn_printed = 1;
-			}
-			bmc->id.device_id++; /* Wraps at 255 */
-			if (bmc->id.device_id == orig_dev_id) {
-				printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-				       "Out of device ids!\n");
-				mutex_unlock(&ipmidriver_mutex);
-				rv = -EAGAIN;
-				goto out;
-			}
-		}
+		bmc->pdev.name = "ipmi_bmc";
 
+		rv = ida_simple_get(&ipmi_bmc_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (rv < 0)
+			goto out;
 		bmc->pdev.dev.driver = &ipmidriver.driver;
-		bmc->pdev.id = bmc->id.device_id;
+		bmc->pdev.id = rv;
 		bmc->pdev.dev.release = release_bmc_device;
 		bmc->pdev.dev.type = &bmc_device_type;
 		kref_init(&bmc->usecount);
 
 		rv = platform_device_register(&bmc->pdev);
+		mutex_lock(&ipmidriver_mutex);
 		list_add_tail(&intf->bmc_link, &bmc->intfs);
 		mutex_unlock(&ipmidriver_mutex);
 		if (rv) {
-- 
2.19.2