From 01215d3edb0f384ddeaa5e4a22c1ae5ff634149f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 11:24:09 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] jbd2: fix compile warning when using JBUFFER_TRACE
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Git-commit: 01215d3edb0f384ddeaa5e4a22c1ae5ff634149f
Patch-mainline: v5.1-rc1
References: bsc#1131168
The jh pointer may be used uninitialized in the two cases below and the
compiler complain about it when enabling JBUFFER_TRACE macro, fix them.
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
Fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_get_undo_access’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ is used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
#define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1219:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
struct journal_head *jh;
^
In file included from fs/jbd2/transaction.c:19:0:
Fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata’:
./include/linux/jbd2.h:1637:38: warning: ‘jh’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
#define JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, info) do { printk("%s: %d\n", __func__, jh->b_jcount);} while (0)
^
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:1332:23: note: ‘jh’ was declared here
struct journal_head *jh;
^
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/jbd2/transaction.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
index 135f0a10f557..a43b63051355 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/transaction.c
@@ -1252,11 +1252,12 @@ int jbd2_journal_get_undo_access(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
struct journal_head *jh;
char *committed_data = NULL;
- JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
if (jbd2_write_access_granted(handle, bh, true))
return 0;
jh = jbd2_journal_add_journal_head(bh);
+ JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
+
/*
* Do this first --- it can drop the journal lock, so we want to
* make sure that obtaining the committed_data is done
@@ -1367,15 +1368,17 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
if (is_handle_aborted(handle))
return -EROFS;
- if (!buffer_jbd(bh)) {
- ret = -EUCLEAN;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (!buffer_jbd(bh))
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+
/*
* We don't grab jh reference here since the buffer must be part
* of the running transaction.
*/
jh = bh2jh(bh);
+ jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
+ JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
+
/*
* This and the following assertions are unreliable since we may see jh
* in inconsistent state unless we grab bh_state lock. But this is
@@ -1409,9 +1412,6 @@ int jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata(handle_t *handle, struct buffer_head *bh)
}
journal = transaction->t_journal;
- jbd_debug(5, "journal_head %p\n", jh);
- JBUFFER_TRACE(jh, "entry");
-
jbd_lock_bh_state(bh);
if (jh->b_modified == 0) {
--
2.16.4