From: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:51:31 +0200
Subject: lib: test_rhashtable: fix for large entry counts
Git-commit: e859afe1ee0c5ae981c55387ccd45eba258a7842
Patch-mainline: v4.13-rc4
References: bsc#1055359

During concurrent access testing, threadfunc() concatenated thread ID
and object index to create a unique key like so:

| tdata->objs[i].value = (tdata->id << 16) | i;

This breaks if a user passes an entries parameter of 64k or higher,
since 'i' might use more than 16 bits then. Effectively, this will lead
to duplicate keys in the table.

Fix the problem by introducing a struct holding object and thread ID and
using that as key instead of a single integer type field.

Fixes: f4a3e90ba5739 ("rhashtable-test: extend to test concurrency")
Reported by: Manuel Messner <mm@skelett.io>
Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil@nwl.cc>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
---
 lib/test_rhashtable.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/test_rhashtable.c b/lib/test_rhashtable.c
index 64e899b63337..16949d219291 100644
--- a/lib/test_rhashtable.c
+++ b/lib/test_rhashtable.c
@@ -56,8 +56,13 @@
 module_param(enomem_retry, bool, 0);
 MODULE_PARM_DESC(enomem_retry, "Retry insert even if -ENOMEM was returned (default: off)");
 
+struct test_obj_val {
+	int	id;
+	int	tid;
+};
+
 struct test_obj {
-	int			value;
+	struct test_obj_val	value;
 	struct rhash_head	node;
 };
 
@@ -72,7 +77,7 @@ struct thread_data {
 static struct rhashtable_params test_rht_params = {
 	.head_offset = offsetof(struct test_obj, node),
 	.key_offset = offsetof(struct test_obj, value),
-	.key_len = sizeof(int),
+	.key_len = sizeof(struct test_obj_val),
 	.hashfn = jhash,
 	.nulls_base = (3U << RHT_BASE_SHIFT),
 };
@@ -109,24 +114,26 @@ static int __init test_rht_lookup(struct rhashtable *ht)
 	for (i = 0; i < entries * 2; i++) {
 		struct test_obj *obj;
 		bool expected = !(i % 2);
-		u32 key = i;
+		struct test_obj_val key = {
+			.id = i,
+		};
 
-		if (array[i / 2].value == TEST_INSERT_FAIL)
+		if (array[i / 2].value.id == TEST_INSERT_FAIL)
 			expected = false;
 
 		obj = rhashtable_lookup_fast(ht, &key, test_rht_params);
 
 		if (expected && !obj) {
-			pr_warn("Test failed: Could not find key %u\n", key);
+			pr_warn("Test failed: Could not find key %u\n", key.id);
 			return -ENOENT;
 		} else if (!expected && obj) {
 			pr_warn("Test failed: Unexpected entry found for key %u\n",
-				key);
+				key.id);
 			return -EEXIST;
 		} else if (expected && obj) {
-			if (obj->value != i) {
+			if (obj->value.id != i) {
 				pr_warn("Test failed: Lookup value mismatch %u!=%u\n",
-					obj->value, i);
+					obj->value.id, i);
 				return -EINVAL;
 			}
 		}
@@ -195,7 +202,7 @@ static s64 __init test_rhashtable(struct rhashtable *ht)
 	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
 		struct test_obj *obj = &array[i];
 
-		obj->value = i * 2;
+		obj->value.id = i * 2;
 		err = insert_retry(ht, &obj->node, test_rht_params);
 		if (err > 0)
 			insert_retries += err;
@@ -218,7 +225,7 @@ static s64 __init test_rhashtable(struct rhashtable *ht)
 	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
 		u32 key = i * 2;
 
-		if (array[i].value != TEST_INSERT_FAIL) {
+		if (array[i].value.id != TEST_INSERT_FAIL) {
 			obj = rhashtable_lookup_fast(ht, &key, test_rht_params);
 			BUG_ON(!obj);
 
@@ -242,18 +249,21 @@ static int thread_lookup_test(struct thread_data *tdata)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
 		struct test_obj *obj;
-		int key = (tdata->id << 16) | i;
+		struct test_obj_val key = {
+			.id = i,
+			.tid = tdata->id,
+		};
 
 		obj = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&ht, &key, test_rht_params);
-		if (obj && (tdata->objs[i].value == TEST_INSERT_FAIL)) {
-			pr_err("  found unexpected object %d\n", key);
+		if (obj && (tdata->objs[i].value.id == TEST_INSERT_FAIL)) {
+			pr_err("  found unexpected object %d-%d\n", key.tid, key.id);
 			err++;
-		} else if (!obj && (tdata->objs[i].value != TEST_INSERT_FAIL)) {
-			pr_err("  object %d not found!\n", key);
+		} else if (!obj && (tdata->objs[i].value.id != TEST_INSERT_FAIL)) {
+			pr_err("  object %d-%d not found!\n", key.tid, key.id);
 			err++;
-		} else if (obj && (obj->value != key)) {
-			pr_err("  wrong object returned (got %d, expected %d)\n",
-			       obj->value, key);
+		} else if (obj && memcmp(&obj->value, &key, sizeof(key))) {
+			pr_err("  wrong object returned (got %d-%d, expected %d-%d)\n",
+			       obj->value.tid, obj->value.id, key.tid, key.id);
 			err++;
 		}
 
@@ -272,7 +282,8 @@ static int threadfunc(void *data)
 		pr_err("  thread[%d]: down_interruptible failed\n", tdata->id);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < entries; i++) {
-		tdata->objs[i].value = (tdata->id << 16) | i;
+		tdata->objs[i].value.id = i;
+		tdata->objs[i].value.tid = tdata->id;
 		err = insert_retry(&ht, &tdata->objs[i].node, test_rht_params);
 		if (err > 0) {
 			insert_retries += err;
@@ -295,7 +306,7 @@ static int threadfunc(void *data)
 
 	for (step = 10; step > 0; step--) {
 		for (i = 0; i < entries; i += step) {
-			if (tdata->objs[i].value == TEST_INSERT_FAIL)
+			if (tdata->objs[i].value.id == TEST_INSERT_FAIL)
 				continue;
 			err = rhashtable_remove_fast(&ht, &tdata->objs[i].node,
 			                             test_rht_params);
@@ -304,7 +315,7 @@ static int threadfunc(void *data)
 				       tdata->id);
 				goto out;
 			}
-			tdata->objs[i].value = TEST_INSERT_FAIL;
+			tdata->objs[i].value.id = TEST_INSERT_FAIL;
 
 			cond_resched();
 		}