From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 17:10:36 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] fs: dlm: move sending fin message into state change handling
References: bsc#1012628
Patch-mainline: 6.2.3
Git-commit: a58496361802070996f9bd76e941d109c4a85ebd
commit a58496361802070996f9bd76e941d109c4a85ebd upstream.
This patch moves the send fin handling, which should appear in a specific
state change, into the state change handling while the per node
state_lock is held. I experienced issues with other messages because
we changed the state and a fin message was sent out in a different state.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 489d8e559c65 ("fs: dlm: add reliable connection if reconnect")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Aring <aahringo@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
fs/dlm/midcomms.c | 33 +++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
index 1fef9921..fd9f413c 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/midcomms.c
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int dlm_send_fin(struct midcomms_node *node,
struct dlm_mhandle *mh;
char *ppc;
- mh = dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(node->nodeid, mb_len, GFP_NOFS, &ppc);
+ mh = dlm_midcomms_get_mhandle(node->nodeid, mb_len, GFP_ATOMIC, &ppc);
if (!mh)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -518,8 +518,8 @@ static void dlm_midcomms_receive_buffer(union dlm_packet *p,
node->state = DLM_LAST_ACK;
pr_debug("switch node %d to state %s case 1\n",
node->nodeid, dlm_state_str(node->state));
- spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
- goto send_fin;
+ set_bit(DLM_NODE_FLAG_STOP_RX, &node->flags);
+ dlm_send_fin(node, dlm_pas_fin_ack_rcv);
}
break;
case DLM_FIN_WAIT1:
@@ -563,12 +563,6 @@ static void dlm_midcomms_receive_buffer(union dlm_packet *p,
log_print_ratelimited("ignore dlm msg because seq mismatch, seq: %u, expected: %u, nodeid: %d",
seq, node->seq_next, node->nodeid);
}
-
- return;
-
-send_fin:
- set_bit(DLM_NODE_FLAG_STOP_RX, &node->flags);
- dlm_send_fin(node, dlm_pas_fin_ack_rcv);
}
static struct midcomms_node *
@@ -1368,11 +1362,11 @@ void dlm_midcomms_remove_member(int nodeid)
case DLM_CLOSE_WAIT:
/* passive shutdown DLM_LAST_ACK case 2 */
node->state = DLM_LAST_ACK;
- spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
-
pr_debug("switch node %d to state %s case 2\n",
node->nodeid, dlm_state_str(node->state));
- goto send_fin;
+ set_bit(DLM_NODE_FLAG_STOP_RX, &node->flags);
+ dlm_send_fin(node, dlm_pas_fin_ack_rcv);
+ break;
case DLM_LAST_ACK:
/* probably receive fin caught it, do nothing */
break;
@@ -1388,12 +1382,6 @@ void dlm_midcomms_remove_member(int nodeid)
spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(&nodes_srcu, idx);
- return;
-
-send_fin:
- set_bit(DLM_NODE_FLAG_STOP_RX, &node->flags);
- dlm_send_fin(node, dlm_pas_fin_ack_rcv);
- srcu_read_unlock(&nodes_srcu, idx);
}
static void midcomms_node_release(struct rcu_head *rcu)
@@ -1425,6 +1413,7 @@ static void midcomms_shutdown(struct midcomms_node *node)
node->state = DLM_FIN_WAIT1;
pr_debug("switch node %d to state %s case 2\n",
node->nodeid, dlm_state_str(node->state));
+ dlm_send_fin(node, dlm_act_fin_ack_rcv);
break;
case DLM_CLOSED:
/* we have what we want */
@@ -1438,12 +1427,8 @@ static void midcomms_shutdown(struct midcomms_node *node)
}
spin_unlock(&node->state_lock);
- if (node->state == DLM_FIN_WAIT1) {
- dlm_send_fin(node, dlm_act_fin_ack_rcv);
-
- if (DLM_DEBUG_FENCE_TERMINATION)
- msleep(5000);
- }
+ if (DLM_DEBUG_FENCE_TERMINATION)
+ msleep(5000);
/* wait for other side dlm + fin */
ret = wait_event_timeout(node->shutdown_wait,
--
2.35.3