From: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 17:50:46 +0800
Subject: swiotlb: fix a typo
Git-commit: 43b919017fe755ccd2b19afb2dc2d3da8f840038
Patch-mainline: v6.0-rc5
References: jsc#PED-3259
"overwirte" isn't a word. It should be "overwrite".
Signed-off-by: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index 1ce8977d911c..0ef6b12f961d 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
/*
* When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig
* to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will
- * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus
+ * overwrite the entire current content. But we don't. Thus
* unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e.
* kernel memory) to user-space.
*/