From: Jeb Cramer <jeb.j.cramer@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2019 01:25:26 -0700
Subject: ice: Fix resource leak in ice_remove_rule_internal()
Patch-mainline: v5.4-rc1
Git-commit: 8132e17dfb1683f1ef7ebf6fa8b61c1f48152660
References: jsc#SLE-7926
We don't free s_rule if ice_aq_sw_rules() returns a non-zero status. If
it returned a zero status, s_rule would be freed right after, so this
implies it should be freed within the scope of the function regardless.
Signed-off-by: Jeb Cramer <jeb.j.cramer@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_switch.c
@@ -1623,12 +1623,13 @@ ice_remove_rule_internal(struct ice_hw *
status = ice_aq_sw_rules(hw, s_rule,
ICE_SW_RULE_RX_TX_NO_HDR_SIZE, 1,
ice_aqc_opc_remove_sw_rules, NULL);
- if (status)
- goto exit;
/* Remove a book keeping from the list */
devm_kfree(ice_hw_to_dev(hw), s_rule);
+ if (status)
+ goto exit;
+
list_del(&list_elem->list_entry);
devm_kfree(ice_hw_to_dev(hw), list_elem);
}