From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2022 22:52:12 +0800
Subject: RDMA/rxe: Rename rxe_atomic_reply to atomic_reply
Patch-mainline: v6.0-rc1
Git-commit: 548c56dd2e55005496160497b8f04595123bbd84
References: jsc#PED-1111

It's better to use the unified naming format.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220705145212.12014-2-yangx.jy@fujitsu.com
Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_resp.c
@@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static struct resp_res *rxe_prepare_res(
 /* Guarantee atomicity of atomic operations at the machine level. */
 static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(atomic_ops_lock);
 
-static enum resp_states rxe_atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
+static enum resp_states atomic_reply(struct rxe_qp *qp,
 					 struct rxe_pkt_info *pkt)
 {
 	u64 *vaddr;
@@ -1333,7 +1333,7 @@ int rxe_responder(void *arg)
 			state = read_reply(qp, pkt);
 			break;
 		case RESPST_ATOMIC_REPLY:
-			state = rxe_atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
+			state = atomic_reply(qp, pkt);
 			break;
 		case RESPST_ACKNOWLEDGE:
 			state = acknowledge(qp, pkt);