Blob Blame History Raw
From 89677197ae709eb1ab3646952c44f6a171c9e74c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2022 15:37:10 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ima: Do not print policy rule with inactive LSM labels
Git-commit: 89677197ae709eb1ab3646952c44f6a171c9e74c
Patch-mainline: v5.17-rc4
References: git-fixes

Before printing a policy rule scan for inactive LSM labels in the policy
rule. Inactive LSM labels are identified by args_p != NULL and
rule == NULL.

Fixes: 483ec26eed42 ("ima: ima/lsm policy rule loading logic bug fixes")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
[zohar@linux.ibm.com: Updated "Fixes" tag]
Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 320ca80aacab..2a1f6418b10a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -1967,6 +1967,14 @@ int ima_policy_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
+	/* Do not print rules with inactive LSM labels */
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LSM_RULES; i++) {
+		if (entry->lsm[i].args_p && !entry->lsm[i].rule) {
+			rcu_read_unlock();
+			return 0;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if (entry->action & MEASURE)
 		seq_puts(m, pt(Opt_measure));
 	if (entry->action & DONT_MEASURE)
-- 
2.31.1