Blob Blame History Raw
From 92b69466102b456c58ae9725540013f893850b6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2021 06:57:25 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: ensure that hash wait lock is IRQ disabling
Git-commit: 08bdbd39b58474d762242e1fadb7f2eb9ffcca71
Patch-mainline: v5.15-rc1
References: stable-5.14.19

commit 08bdbd39b58474d762242e1fadb7f2eb9ffcca71 upstream.

A previous commit removed the IRQ safety of the worker and wqe locks,
but that left one spot of the hash wait lock now being done without
already having IRQs disabled.

Ensure that we use the right locking variant for the hashed waitqueue
lock.

Fixes: a9a4aa9fbfc5 ("io-wq: wqe and worker locks no longer need to be IRQ safe")
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 fs/io-wq.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index cb5d84f6b769..4f460797f962 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static void io_wait_on_hash(struct io_wqe *wqe, unsigned int hash)
 {
 	struct io_wq *wq = wqe->wq;
 
-	spin_lock(&wq->hash->wait.lock);
+	spin_lock_irq(&wq->hash->wait.lock);
 	if (list_empty(&wqe->wait.entry)) {
 		__add_wait_queue(&wq->hash->wait, &wqe->wait);
 		if (!test_bit(hash, &wq->hash->map)) {
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ static void io_wait_on_hash(struct io_wqe *wqe, unsigned int hash)
 			list_del_init(&wqe->wait.entry);
 		}
 	}
-	spin_unlock(&wq->hash->wait.lock);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&wq->hash->wait.lock);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.26.2