From 86127bb18aea7e553cfd0842bcd33a6dc80bfbc8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2022 17:52:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] io-wq: use IO_WQ_ACCT_NR rather than hardcoded number
Git-commit: 86127bb18aea7e553cfd0842bcd33a6dc80bfbc8
Patch-mainline: v5.18-rc1
References: bsc#1205205
It's better to use the defined enum stuff not the hardcoded number to
define array.
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220206095241.121485-4-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@suse.de>
---
fs/io-wq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/io-wq.c b/fs/io-wq.c
index f7b7fa396faf..5b93fa67d346 100644
--- a/fs/io-wq.c
+++ b/fs/io-wq.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ enum {
*/
struct io_wqe {
raw_spinlock_t lock;
- struct io_wqe_acct acct[2];
+ struct io_wqe_acct acct[IO_WQ_ACCT_NR];
int node;
@@ -1376,7 +1376,7 @@ int io_wq_max_workers(struct io_wq *wq, int *new_count)
BUILD_BUG_ON((int) IO_WQ_ACCT_UNBOUND != (int) IO_WQ_UNBOUND);
BUILD_BUG_ON((int) IO_WQ_ACCT_NR != 2);
- for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < IO_WQ_ACCT_NR; i++) {
if (new_count[i] > task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC))
new_count[i] = task_rlimit(current, RLIMIT_NPROC);
}
--
2.35.3