From e08f343be00c3fe8f9f6ac58085c81bcdd231fab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 18:46:45 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] locking: Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().
Git-commit: e08f343be00c3fe8f9f6ac58085c81bcdd231fab
Patch-mainline: v5.17-rc1
References: bsc#1190137 bsc#1189998

rt_rwlock_is_contended() has no users. It makes no sense to use it as
rwlock_is_contended() because it is a sleeping lock on RT and
preemption is possible. It reports always != 0 if used by a writer and
even if there is a waiter then the lock might not be handed over if
the current owner has the highest priority.

Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>

---
 kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c | 6 ------
 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index b2e553f9255b..9e396a09fe0f 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -257,12 +257,6 @@ void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
 
-int __sched rt_rwlock_is_contended(rwlock_t *rwlock)
-{
-	return rw_base_is_contended(&rwlock->rwbase);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_rwlock_is_contended);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, const char *name,
 		      struct lock_class_key *key)
-- 
2.35.1