Blob Blame History Raw
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 14:40:42 +0300
Subject: net/mlx5: delete dead code in mlx5_esw_unlock()
Patch-mainline: v6.0-rc1
Git-commit: 8e755f7a8cef6c3b64c5bdac2c8a3d6efb9f916c
References: jsc#PED-1549

Smatch complains about this function:

    drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c:2000 mlx5_esw_unlock()
    warn: inconsistent returns '&esw->mode_lock'.

Before commit ec2fa47d7b98 ("net/mlx5: Lag, use lag lock") there
used to be a matching mlx5_esw_lock() function and the lock and
unlock functions were symmetric.  But now we take the lock
unconditionally and must unlock unconditionally as well.

As near as I can tell this is dead code and can just be deleted.

Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c |    2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/eswitch.c
@@ -1995,8 +1995,6 @@ int mlx5_esw_try_lock(struct mlx5_eswitc
  */
 void mlx5_esw_unlock(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw)
 {
-	if (!mlx5_esw_allowed(esw))
-		return;
 	up_write(&esw->mode_lock);
 }