From: Hyong Youb Kim <hyonkim@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 14:51:39 +0100
Subject: net/mlx5e: Do not increment ESN when updating IPsec ESN state
Patch-mainline: v6.1-rc3
Git-commit: 888be6b279b7257b5f6e4c9527675bff0a335596
References: jsc#PED-1549

An offloaded SA stops receiving after about 2^32 + replay_window
packets. For example, when SA reaches <seq-hi 0x1, seq 0x2c>, all
subsequent packets get dropped with SA-icv-failure (integrity_failed).

To reproduce the bug:
- ConnectX-6 Dx with crypto enabled (FW 22.30.1004)
- ipsec.conf:
  nic-offload = yes
  replay-window = 32
  esn = yes
  salifetime=24h
- Run netperf for a long time to send more than 2^32 packets
  netperf -H <device-under-test> -t TCP_STREAM -l 20000

When 2^32 + replay_window packets are received, the replay window
moves from the 2nd half of subspace (overlap=1) to the 1st half
(overlap=0). The driver then updates the 'esn' value in NIC
(i.e. seq_hi) as follows.

 seq_hi = xfrm_replay_seqhi(seq_bottom)
 new esn in NIC = seq_hi + 1

The +1 increment is wrong, as seq_hi already contains the correct
seq_hi. For example, when seq_hi=1, the driver actually tells NIC to
use seq_hi=2 (esn). This incorrect esn value causes all subsequent
packets to fail integrity checks (SA-icv-failure). So, do not
increment.

Fixes: cb01008390bb ("net/mlx5: IPSec, Add support for ESN")
Signed-off-by: Hyong Youb Kim <hyonkim@cisco.com>
Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221026135153.154807-2-saeed@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c |    3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c
@@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ static bool mlx5e_ipsec_update_esn_state
 	struct xfrm_replay_state_esn *replay_esn;
 	u32 seq_bottom = 0;
 	u8 overlap;
-	u32 *esn;
 
 	if (!(sa_entry->x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN)) {
 		sa_entry->esn_state.trigger = 0;
@@ -116,11 +115,9 @@ static bool mlx5e_ipsec_update_esn_state
 
 	sa_entry->esn_state.esn = xfrm_replay_seqhi(sa_entry->x,
 						    htonl(seq_bottom));
-	esn = &sa_entry->esn_state.esn;
 
 	sa_entry->esn_state.trigger = 1;
 	if (unlikely(overlap && seq_bottom < MLX5E_IPSEC_ESN_SCOPE_MID)) {
-		++(*esn);
 		sa_entry->esn_state.overlap = 0;
 		return true;
 	} else if (unlikely(!overlap &&