Blob Blame History Raw
From 9321f8152d9a764208c3f0dad49e0c55f293b7ab Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 17:00:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] rtmutex: Wake up the waiters lockless while dropping the read lock.
Git-commit: 9321f8152d9a764208c3f0dad49e0c55f293b7ab
Patch-mainline: v5.16-rc1
References: bsc#1190137 bsc#1189998

The rw_semaphore and rwlock_t implementation both wake the waiter while
holding the rt_mutex_base::wait_lock acquired.
This can be optimized by waking the waiter lockless outside of the
locked section to avoid a needless contention on the
rt_mutex_base::wait_lock lock.

Extend rt_mutex_wake_q_add() to also accept task and state and use it in
__rwbase_read_unlock().

Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210928150006.597310-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> 

---
 kernel/locking/rtmutex.c   | 19 +++++++++++++------
 kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c |  6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
index cafc259ec59d..0c6a48dfcecb 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
@@ -446,19 +446,26 @@ static __always_inline void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *p)
 }
 
 /* RT mutex specific wake_q wrappers */
-static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh,
-						struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
+static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh,
+						     struct task_struct *task,
+						     unsigned int wake_state)
 {
-	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && w->wake_state == TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) {
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wake_state == TASK_RTLOCK_WAIT) {
 		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING))
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(wqh->rtlock_task);
-		get_task_struct(w->task);
-		wqh->rtlock_task = w->task;
+		get_task_struct(task);
+		wqh->rtlock_task = task;
 	} else {
-		wake_q_add(&wqh->head, w->task);
+		wake_q_add(&wqh->head, task);
 	}
 }
 
+static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_q_add(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh,
+						struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
+{
+	rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(wqh, w->task, w->wake_state);
+}
+
 static __always_inline void rt_mutex_wake_up_q(struct rt_wake_q_head *wqh)
 {
 	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && wqh->rtlock_task) {
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
index 4ba15088e640..6b143fb294f6 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
@@ -141,6 +141,7 @@ static void __sched __rwbase_read_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
 {
 	struct rt_mutex_base *rtm = &rwb->rtmutex;
 	struct task_struct *owner;
+	DEFINE_RT_WAKE_Q(wqh);
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
 	/*
@@ -151,9 +152,12 @@ static void __sched __rwbase_read_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
 	 */
 	owner = rt_mutex_owner(rtm);
 	if (owner)
-		wake_up_state(owner, state);
+		rt_mutex_wake_q_add_task(&wqh, owner, state);
 
+	/* Pairs with the preempt_enable in rt_mutex_wake_up_q() */
+	preempt_disable();
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
+	rt_mutex_wake_up_q(&wqh);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void rwbase_read_unlock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
-- 
2.26.2