From: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 19:57:34 +0100
Subject: sfc: add a hashtable for offloaded TC rules
Patch-mainline: v6.1-rc1
Git-commit: f54a28a211664017531aebc997bf3c6a279e0d6f
References: jsc#PED-1565
Nothing inserts into this table yet, but we have code to remove rules
on FLOW_CLS_DESTROY or at driver teardown time, in both cases also
attempting to remove the corresponding hardware rules.
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c | 2
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h | 1
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h | 7 ++
4 files changed, 123 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.c
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static void efx_ef100_rep_get_stats64(st
stats->tx_errors = atomic64_read(&efv->stats.tx_errors);
}
-static const struct net_device_ops efx_ef100_rep_netdev_ops = {
+const struct net_device_ops efx_ef100_rep_netdev_ops = {
.ndo_open = efx_ef100_rep_open,
.ndo_stop = efx_ef100_rep_close,
.ndo_start_xmit = efx_ef100_rep_xmit,
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/ef100_rep.h
@@ -66,4 +66,5 @@ void efx_ef100_rep_rx_packet(struct efx_
* Caller must hold rcu_read_lock().
*/
struct efx_rep *efx_ef100_find_rep_by_mport(struct efx_nic *efx, u16 mport);
+extern const struct net_device_ops efx_ef100_rep_netdev_ops;
#endif /* EF100_REP_H */
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.c
@@ -15,6 +15,39 @@
#include "ef100_rep.h"
#include "efx.h"
+#define EFX_EFV_PF NULL
+/* Look up the representor information (efv) for a device.
+ * May return NULL for the PF (us), or an error pointer for a device that
+ * isn't supported as a TC offload endpoint
+ */
+static struct efx_rep *efx_tc_flower_lookup_efv(struct efx_nic *efx,
+ struct net_device *dev)
+{
+ struct efx_rep *efv;
+
+ if (!dev)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+ /* Is it us (the PF)? */
+ if (dev == efx->net_dev)
+ return EFX_EFV_PF;
+ /* Is it an efx vfrep at all? */
+ if (dev->netdev_ops != &efx_ef100_rep_netdev_ops)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+ /* Is it ours? We don't support TC rules that include another
+ * EF100's netdevices (not even on another port of the same NIC).
+ */
+ efv = netdev_priv(dev);
+ if (efv->parent != efx)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
+ return efv;
+}
+
+static const struct rhashtable_params efx_tc_match_action_ht_params = {
+ .key_len = sizeof(unsigned long),
+ .key_offset = offsetof(struct efx_tc_flow_rule, cookie),
+ .head_offset = offsetof(struct efx_tc_flow_rule, linkage),
+};
+
static void efx_tc_free_action_set(struct efx_nic *efx,
struct efx_tc_action_set *act, bool in_hw)
{
@@ -59,10 +92,74 @@ static void efx_tc_delete_rule(struct ef
rule->fw_id = MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_ACTION_RULE_ID_NULL;
}
+static void efx_tc_flow_free(void *ptr, void *arg)
+{
+ struct efx_tc_flow_rule *rule = ptr;
+ struct efx_nic *efx = arg;
+
+ netif_err(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "tc rule %lx still present at teardown, removing\n",
+ rule->cookie);
+
+ efx_mae_delete_rule(efx, rule->fw_id);
+
+ /* Release entries in subsidiary tables */
+ efx_tc_free_action_set_list(efx, &rule->acts, true);
+
+ kfree(rule);
+}
+
+static int efx_tc_flower_destroy(struct efx_nic *efx,
+ struct net_device *net_dev,
+ struct flow_cls_offload *tc)
+{
+ struct netlink_ext_ack *extack = tc->common.extack;
+ struct efx_tc_flow_rule *rule;
+
+ rule = rhashtable_lookup_fast(&efx->tc->match_action_ht, &tc->cookie,
+ efx_tc_match_action_ht_params);
+ if (!rule) {
+ /* Only log a message if we're the ingress device. Otherwise
+ * it's a foreign filter and we might just not have been
+ * interested (e.g. we might not have been the egress device
+ * either).
+ */
+ if (!IS_ERR(efx_tc_flower_lookup_efv(efx, net_dev)))
+ netif_warn(efx, drv, efx->net_dev,
+ "Filter %lx not found to remove\n", tc->cookie);
+ NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Flow cookie not found in offloaded rules");
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
+ /* Remove it from HW */
+ efx_tc_delete_rule(efx, rule);
+ /* Delete it from SW */
+ rhashtable_remove_fast(&efx->tc->match_action_ht, &rule->linkage,
+ efx_tc_match_action_ht_params);
+ netif_dbg(efx, drv, efx->net_dev, "Removed filter %lx\n", rule->cookie);
+ kfree(rule);
+ return 0;
+}
+
int efx_tc_flower(struct efx_nic *efx, struct net_device *net_dev,
struct flow_cls_offload *tc, struct efx_rep *efv)
{
- return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ int rc;
+
+ if (!efx->tc)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ mutex_lock(&efx->tc->mutex);
+ switch (tc->command) {
+ case FLOW_CLS_DESTROY:
+ rc = efx_tc_flower_destroy(efx, net_dev, tc);
+ break;
+ default:
+ rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ break;
+ }
+ mutex_unlock(&efx->tc->mutex);
+ return rc;
}
static int efx_tc_configure_default_rule(struct efx_nic *efx, u32 ing_port,
@@ -239,6 +336,8 @@ void efx_fini_tc(struct efx_nic *efx)
int efx_init_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *efx)
{
+ int rc;
+
if (efx->type->is_vf)
return 0;
@@ -247,6 +346,10 @@ int efx_init_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *e
return -ENOMEM;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&efx->tc->block_list);
+ mutex_init(&efx->tc->mutex);
+ rc = rhashtable_init(&efx->tc->match_action_ht, &efx_tc_match_action_ht_params);
+ if (rc < 0)
+ goto fail_match_action_ht;
efx->tc->reps_filter_uc = -1;
efx->tc->reps_filter_mc = -1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&efx->tc->dflt.pf.acts.list);
@@ -254,6 +357,11 @@ int efx_init_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *e
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&efx->tc->dflt.wire.acts.list);
efx->tc->dflt.wire.fw_id = MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_ACTION_RULE_ID_NULL;
return 0;
+fail_match_action_ht:
+ mutex_destroy(&efx->tc->mutex);
+ kfree(efx->tc);
+ efx->tc = NULL;
+ return rc;
}
void efx_fini_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *efx)
@@ -261,10 +369,15 @@ void efx_fini_struct_tc(struct efx_nic *
if (!efx->tc)
return;
+ mutex_lock(&efx->tc->mutex);
EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->tc->dflt.pf.fw_id !=
MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_ACTION_RULE_ID_NULL);
EFX_WARN_ON_PARANOID(efx->tc->dflt.wire.fw_id !=
MC_CMD_MAE_ACTION_RULE_INSERT_OUT_ACTION_RULE_ID_NULL);
+ rhashtable_free_and_destroy(&efx->tc->match_action_ht, efx_tc_flow_free,
+ efx);
+ mutex_unlock(&efx->tc->mutex);
+ mutex_destroy(&efx->tc->mutex);
kfree(efx->tc);
efx->tc = NULL;
}
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/tc.h
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
#ifndef EFX_TC_H
#define EFX_TC_H
#include <net/flow_offload.h>
+#include <linux/rhashtable.h>
#include "net_driver.h"
/* Error reporting: convenience macros. For indicating why a given filter
@@ -55,6 +56,8 @@ struct efx_tc_action_set_list {
};
struct efx_tc_flow_rule {
+ unsigned long cookie;
+ struct rhash_head linkage;
struct efx_tc_match match;
struct efx_tc_action_set_list acts;
u32 fw_id;
@@ -69,6 +72,8 @@ enum efx_tc_rule_prios {
* struct efx_tc_state - control plane data for TC offload
*
* @block_list: List of &struct efx_tc_block_binding
+ * @mutex: Used to serialise operations on TC hashtables
+ * @match_action_ht: Hashtable of TC match-action rules
* @reps_mport_id: MAE port allocated for representor RX
* @reps_filter_uc: VNIC filter for representor unicast RX (promisc)
* @reps_filter_mc: VNIC filter for representor multicast RX (allmulti)
@@ -81,6 +86,8 @@ enum efx_tc_rule_prios {
*/
struct efx_tc_state {
struct list_head block_list;
+ struct mutex mutex;
+ struct rhashtable match_action_ht;
u32 reps_mport_id, reps_mport_vport_id;
s32 reps_filter_uc, reps_filter_mc;
struct {