Blob Blame History Raw
From 0b91b5332368f2fb0c3e5cfebc6aff9e167acd8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhenguo Zhao <Zhenguo.Zhao1@unisoc.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 20:17:52 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] tty: n_gsm: Save dlci address open status when config requester
Git-commit: 0b91b5332368f2fb0c3e5cfebc6aff9e167acd8b
Patch-mainline: v5.16-rc1
References: git-fixes

When n_gsm config "initiator=0",as requester ,receive SABM frame,n_gsm
register gsmtty dev,and save dlci open address status,if receive DLC0
DISC or CLD frame,it can unregister the gsmtty dev by saving dlci address.

Signed-off-by: Zhenguo Zhao <Zhenguo.Zhao1@unisoc.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1629461872-26965-8-git-send-email-zhenguo6858@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>

---
 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
index db55f3fb0cdb..157b51ce9cc0 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
@@ -271,6 +271,10 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(gsm_mux_lock);
 
 static struct tty_driver *gsm_tty_driver;
 
+/* Save dlci open address */
+static int addr_open[256] = { 0 };
+/* Save dlci open count */
+static int addr_cnt;
 /*
  *	This section of the driver logic implements the GSM encodings
  *	both the basic and the 'advanced'. Reliable transport is not
@@ -1181,6 +1185,7 @@ static void gsm_control_rls(struct gsm_mux *gsm, const u8 *data, int clen)
 }
 
 static void gsm_dlci_begin_close(struct gsm_dlci *dlci);
+static void gsm_dlci_close(struct gsm_dlci *dlci);
 
 /**
  *	gsm_control_message	-	DLCI 0 control processing
@@ -1199,15 +1204,28 @@ static void gsm_control_message(struct gsm_mux *gsm, unsigned int command,
 {
 	u8 buf[1];
 	unsigned long flags;
+	struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
+	int i;
+	int address;
 
 	switch (command) {
 	case CMD_CLD: {
-		struct gsm_dlci *dlci = gsm->dlci[0];
+		if (addr_cnt > 0) {
+			for (i = 0; i < addr_cnt; i++) {
+				address = addr_open[i];
+				dlci = gsm->dlci[address];
+				gsm_dlci_close(dlci);
+				addr_open[i] = 0;
+			}
+		}
 		/* Modem wishes to close down */
+		dlci = gsm->dlci[0];
 		if (dlci) {
 			dlci->dead = true;
 			gsm->dead = true;
-			gsm_dlci_begin_close(dlci);
+			gsm_dlci_close(dlci);
+			addr_cnt = 0;
+			gsm_response(gsm, 0, UA|PF);
 		}
 		}
 		break;
@@ -1756,6 +1774,7 @@ static void gsm_queue(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 	struct gsm_dlci *dlci;
 	u8 cr;
 	int address;
+	int i, j, k, address_tmp;
 	/* We have to sneak a look at the packet body to do the FCS.
 	   A somewhat layering violation in the spec */
 
@@ -1798,6 +1817,11 @@ static void gsm_queue(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 		else {
 			gsm_response(gsm, address, UA|PF);
 			gsm_dlci_open(dlci);
+			/* Save dlci open address */
+			if (address) {
+				addr_open[addr_cnt] = address;
+				addr_cnt++;
+			}
 		}
 		break;
 	case DISC|PF:
@@ -1808,8 +1832,33 @@ static void gsm_queue(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
 			return;
 		}
 		/* Real close complete */
-		gsm_response(gsm, address, UA|PF);
-		gsm_dlci_close(dlci);
+		if (!address) {
+			if (addr_cnt > 0) {
+				for (i = 0; i < addr_cnt; i++) {
+					address = addr_open[i];
+					dlci = gsm->dlci[address];
+					gsm_dlci_close(dlci);
+					addr_open[i] = 0;
+				}
+			}
+			dlci = gsm->dlci[0];
+			gsm_dlci_close(dlci);
+			addr_cnt = 0;
+			gsm_response(gsm, 0, UA|PF);
+		} else {
+			gsm_response(gsm, address, UA|PF);
+			gsm_dlci_close(dlci);
+			/* clear dlci address */
+			for (j = 0; j < addr_cnt; j++) {
+				address_tmp = addr_open[j];
+				if (address_tmp == address) {
+					for (k = j; k < addr_cnt; k++)
+						addr_open[k] = addr_open[k+1];
+				addr_cnt--;
+				break;
+				}
+			}
+		}
 		break;
 	case UA:
 	case UA|PF:
-- 
2.35.3