From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2021 09:03:34 +0800
Subject: s390/net: replace in_irq() with in_hardirq()
Git-commit: e871ee6941842d4e52a7d81a9986cb6daf441dae
Patch-mainline: v5.15-rc1
References: jsc#PED-594 LTC#198619

Replace the obsolete and ambiguos macro in_irq() with new
macro in_hardirq().

Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>
---
 drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c |    2 +-
 drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c  |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_fsms.c
@@ -1444,7 +1444,7 @@ again:
 			if (do_debug_ccw)
 			ctcmpc_dumpit((char *)&ch->ccw[0],
 					sizeof(struct ccw1) * 3);
-		dolock = !in_irq();
+		dolock = !in_hardirq();
 		if (dolock)
 			spin_lock_irqsave(
 				get_ccwdev_lock(ch->cdev), saveflags);
--- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_mpc.c
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ static void mpc_action_side_xid(fsm_inst
 	CTCM_D3_DUMP((char *)ch->xid, XID2_LENGTH);
 	CTCM_D3_DUMP((char *)ch->xid_id, 4);
 
-	if (!in_irq()) {
+	if (!in_hardirq()) {
 			 /* Such conditional locking is a known problem for
 			  * sparse because its static undeterministic.
 			  * Warnings should be ignored here. */