Blob Blame History Raw
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:55:03 -0700
Subject: kvm: x86: Add "significant index" flag to a few CPUID leaves
Git-commit: a06dcd625d6181747fac7f4c140b5a4c397a778c
Patch-mainline: 5.4-rc1
References: bnc#1151927 5.3.4

According to the Intel SDM, volume 2, "CPUID," the index is
significant (or partially significant) for CPUID leaves 0FH, 10H, 12H,
17H, 18H, and 1FH.

Add the corresponding flag to these CPUID leaves in do_host_cpuid().

Signed-off-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Steve Rutherford <srutherford@google.com>
Fixes: a87f2d3a6eadab ("KVM: x86: Add Intel CPUID.1F cpuid emulation support")
Reviewed-by: Krish Sadhukhan <krish.sadhukhan@oracle.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
@@ -304,7 +304,13 @@ static void do_host_cpuid(struct kvm_cpu
 	case 7:
 	case 0xb:
 	case 0xd:
+	case 0xf:
+	case 0x10:
+	case 0x12:
 	case 0x14:
+	case 0x17:
+	case 0x18:
+	case 0x1f:
 	case 0x8000001d:
 		entry->flags |= KVM_CPUID_FLAG_SIGNIFCANT_INDEX;
 		break;