From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 07:18:08 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ipmi:ssif: Add missing unlock in error branch
References: bnc#1060662
Patch-mainline: v4.12.4
Git-commit: 4495ec6d770e1bca7a04e93ac453ab6720c56c5d

commit 4495ec6d770e1bca7a04e93ac453ab6720c56c5d upstream.

When getting flags, a response to a different message would
result in a deadlock because of a missing unlock.  Add that
unlock and a comment.  Found by static analysis.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
---
 drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
index 0b22a9be5029..12d15212f0b2 100644
--- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
+++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_ssif.c
@@ -761,6 +761,11 @@ static void msg_done_handler(struct ssif_info *ssif_info, int result,
 			       result, len, data[2]);
 		} else if (data[0] != (IPMI_NETFN_APP_REQUEST | 1) << 2
 			   || data[1] != IPMI_GET_MSG_FLAGS_CMD) {
+			/*
+			 * Don't abort here, maybe it was a queued
+			 * response to a previous command.
+			 */
+			ipmi_ssif_unlock_cond(ssif_info, flags);
 			pr_warn(PFX "Invalid response getting flags: %x %x\n",
 				data[0], data[1]);
 		} else {
-- 
2.14.2