From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 08:34:59 -0700
Subject: e1000e: Drop unnecessary __E1000_DOWN bit twiddling
Patch-mainline: v5.5-rc1
Git-commit: daee5598e491d8d3979bd4ad6c447d89ce57b446
References: jsc#SLE-8100
Since we no longer check for __E1000_DOWN in e1000e_close we can drop the
spot where we were restoring the bit. This saves us a bit of unnecessary
complexity.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c
@@ -7591,15 +7591,13 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev
{
struct net_device *netdev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
struct e1000_adapter *adapter = netdev_priv(netdev);
- bool down = test_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
e1000e_ptp_remove(adapter);
/* The timers may be rescheduled, so explicitly disable them
* from being rescheduled.
*/
- if (!down)
- set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
+ set_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
del_timer_sync(&adapter->phy_info_timer);
cancel_work_sync(&adapter->reset_task);
@@ -7619,9 +7617,6 @@ static void e1000_remove(struct pci_dev
}
}
- /* Don't lie to e1000_close() down the road. */
- if (!down)
- clear_bit(__E1000_DOWN, &adapter->state);
unregister_netdev(netdev);
if (pci_dev_run_wake(pdev))