From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2021 01:00:18 +0100
Subject: ice: Re-organizes reqstd/avail {R, T}XQ check/code for efficiency
Patch-mainline: v5.14-rc1
Git-commit: b38b7f2bb418510397714c7fb3bed64b6fd024e5
References: jsc#SLE-7926
If user has explicitly requested the number of {R,T}XQs, then it is
unnecessary to get the count of already available {R,T}XQs from the
PF avail_{r,t}xqs bitmap. This value will get overridden by user specified
value in any case.
Re-organize this code for improving the flow, readability and efficiency.
This scope of improvement was found during the review of the ICE driver
code.
Fixes: 87324e747fde ("ice: Implement ethtool ops for channels")
Cc: intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tonyx.brelinski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
@@ -140,12 +140,13 @@ static void ice_vsi_set_num_qs(struct ic
switch (vsi->type) {
case ICE_VSI_PF:
- vsi->alloc_txq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
- ice_get_avail_txq_count(pf),
- (u16)num_online_cpus());
if (vsi->req_txq) {
vsi->alloc_txq = vsi->req_txq;
vsi->num_txq = vsi->req_txq;
+ } else {
+ vsi->alloc_txq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
+ ice_get_avail_txq_count(pf),
+ (u16)num_online_cpus());
}
pf->num_lan_tx = vsi->alloc_txq;
@@ -154,12 +155,13 @@ static void ice_vsi_set_num_qs(struct ic
if (!test_bit(ICE_FLAG_RSS_ENA, pf->flags)) {
vsi->alloc_rxq = 1;
} else {
- vsi->alloc_rxq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
- ice_get_avail_rxq_count(pf),
- (u16)num_online_cpus());
if (vsi->req_rxq) {
vsi->alloc_rxq = vsi->req_rxq;
vsi->num_rxq = vsi->req_rxq;
+ } else {
+ vsi->alloc_rxq = min3(pf->num_lan_msix,
+ ice_get_avail_rxq_count(pf),
+ (u16)num_online_cpus());
}
}