From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2023 17:54:28 -0500
Subject: scsi: ibmvfc: Fix erroneous use of rtas_busy_delay with hcall return
 code
Git-commit: 670106eb4c8b23475f8c2b3416005a312afa622f
Patch-mainline: v6.7-rc1
References: git-fixes

Commit 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ
during cleanup") wrongly changed the busy loop check to use
rtas_busy_delay() instead of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY(). The busy return
codes for RTAS and hypercalls are not the same.

Fix this issue by restoring the use of H_BUSY and H_IS_LONG_BUSY().

Fixes: 0217a272fe13 ("scsi: ibmvfc: Store return code of H_FREE_SUB_CRQ  during cleanup")
Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230921225435.3537728-5-tyreld@linux.ibm.com
Reviewed-by: Brian King <brking@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Lee Duncan <lduncan@suse.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
index 2bfeeb9ace01..30baa046ae5b 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
 #include <linux/bsg-lib.h>
 #include <asm/firmware.h>
 #include <asm/irq.h>
-#include <asm/rtas.h>
 #include <asm/vio.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi.h>
 #include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h>
@@ -5952,7 +5951,7 @@ static int ibmvfc_register_scsi_channel(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost,
 irq_failed:
 	do {
 		rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_FREE_SUB_CRQ, vdev->unit_address, scrq->cookie);
-	} while (rtas_busy_delay(rc));
+	} while (rc == H_BUSY || H_IS_LONG_BUSY(rc));
 reg_failed:
 	LEAVE;
 	return rc;