From 56d99e81ecbc997a5f984684d0eeb583992b2072 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2022 15:43:42 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] net/smc: Fix hung_task when removing SMC-R devices
Git-commit: 56d99e81ecbc997a5f984684d0eeb583992b2072
Patch-mainline: v5.17-rc1
References: bsc#1197082
A hung_task is observed when removing SMC-R devices. Suppose that
a link group has two active links(lnk_A, lnk_B) associated with two
different SMC-R devices(dev_A, dev_B). When dev_A is removed, the
link group will be removed from smc_lgr_list and added into
lgr_linkdown_list. lnk_A will be cleared and smcibdev(A)->lnk_cnt
will reach to zero. However, when dev_B is removed then, the link
group can't be found in smc_lgr_list and lnk_B won't be cleared,
making smcibdev->lnk_cnt never reaches zero, which causes a hung_task.
This patch fixes this issue by restoring the implementation of
smc_smcr_terminate_all() to what it was before commit 349d43127dac
("net/smc: fix kernel panic caused by race of smc_sock"). The original
implementation also satisfies the intention that make sure QP destroy
earlier than CQ destroy because we will always wait for smcibdev->lnk_cnt
reaches zero, which guarantees QP has been destroyed.
Fixes: 349d43127dac ("net/smc: fix kernel panic caused by race of smc_sock")
Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
---
net/smc/smc_core.c | 17 +----------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_core.c b/net/smc/smc_core.c
index 7199eeeb1667..29525d03b253 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_core.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_core.c
@@ -1531,16 +1531,11 @@ void smc_smcd_terminate_all(struct smcd_dev *smcd)
/* Called when an SMCR device is removed or the smc module is unloaded.
* If smcibdev is given, all SMCR link groups using this device are terminated.
* If smcibdev is NULL, all SMCR link groups are terminated.
- *
- * We must wait here for QPs been destroyed before we destroy the CQs,
- * or we won't received any CQEs and cdc_pend_tx_wr cannot reach 0 thus
- * smc_sock cannot be released.
*/
void smc_smcr_terminate_all(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev)
{
struct smc_link_group *lgr, *lg;
LIST_HEAD(lgr_free_list);
- LIST_HEAD(lgr_linkdown_list);
int i;
spin_lock_bh(&smc_lgr_list.lock);
@@ -1552,7 +1547,7 @@ void smc_smcr_terminate_all(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev)
list_for_each_entry_safe(lgr, lg, &smc_lgr_list.list, list) {
for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) {
if (lgr->lnk[i].smcibdev == smcibdev)
- list_move_tail(&lgr->list, &lgr_linkdown_list);
+ smcr_link_down_cond_sched(&lgr->lnk[i]);
}
}
}
@@ -1564,16 +1559,6 @@ void smc_smcr_terminate_all(struct smc_ib_device *smcibdev)
__smc_lgr_terminate(lgr, false);
}
- list_for_each_entry_safe(lgr, lg, &lgr_linkdown_list, list) {
- for (i = 0; i < SMC_LINKS_PER_LGR_MAX; i++) {
- if (lgr->lnk[i].smcibdev == smcibdev) {
- mutex_lock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
- smcr_link_down_cond(&lgr->lnk[i]);
- mutex_unlock(&lgr->llc_conf_mutex);
- }
- }
- }
-
if (smcibdev) {
if (atomic_read(&smcibdev->lnk_cnt))
wait_event(smcibdev->lnks_deleted,
--
2.31.1