From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:21:01 +0200
Subject: selftests/bpf: Define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME for aarch64
Patch-mainline: v5.19-rc1
Git-commit: d298761746d59ca169dfe68b4d0a983c3053573b
References: jsc#PED-1377

attach_probe selftest fails on aarch64 with `failed to create kprobe
'sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory`. This is
because, like on several other architectures, nanosleep has a prefix.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220404142101.27900-1-iii@linux.ibm.com
Acked-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h
@@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ int trigger_module_test_write(int write_
 #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep"
 #elif defined(__s390x__)
 #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep"
+#elif defined(__aarch64__)
+#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__arm64_sys_nanosleep"
 #else
 #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep"
 #endif