From b62f66442bfbcea7c11afe4917e196fa95a65083 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2021 17:27:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 33/33] pcm: rate - fix the capture delay values

Use the correct snd_pcm_mmap_capture_delay() function instead
snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail().

Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
---
 src/pcm/pcm_rate.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c b/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c
index 3d301d0e317b..770aafea567d 100644
--- a/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c
+++ b/src/pcm/pcm_rate.c
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ static int snd_pcm_rate_delay(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_sframes_t *delayp)
 				+ snd_pcm_rate_playback_internal_delay(pcm);
 	} else {
 		*delayp = rate->ops.output_frames(rate->obj, slave_delay)
-				+ snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail(pcm);
+				+ snd_pcm_mmap_capture_delay(pcm);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -1157,12 +1157,8 @@ static int snd_pcm_rate_status(snd_pcm_t *pcm, snd_pcm_status_t * status)
 		status->avail = snd_pcm_mmap_playback_avail(pcm);
 		status->avail_max = rate->ops.input_frames(rate->obj, status->avail_max);
 	} else {
-		/* FIXME: Maybe possible to somthing similar to
-		 * snd_pcm_rate_playback_internal_delay()
-		 * for the capture case.
-		 */
 		status->delay = rate->ops.output_frames(rate->obj, status->delay)
-					+ snd_pcm_mmap_capture_hw_avail(pcm);
+					+ snd_pcm_mmap_capture_delay(pcm);
 		status->avail = snd_pcm_mmap_capture_avail(pcm);
 		status->avail_max = rate->ops.output_frames(rate->obj, status->avail_max);
 	}
-- 
2.26.2